• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE PENTAX; VIDEO GASTROSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE PENTAX; VIDEO GASTROSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number EG-2990I
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This mdr was initiated as part of a retrospective assessment of complaints/events in the us.As part of this assessment, pentax medical evaluated all us events/complaints received for currently marketed bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, and gastroscopes.The results of this retrospective assessment prompted pentax medical to file this report.
 
Event Description
Pentax medical became aware of a report stating the water deflector tip came loose and is missing at the conclusion of a case involving pentax model eg-2990i/serial (b)(4).No information was received from the customer regarding any adverse impact on the patient.The device involved in the event was forwarded to pentax for evaluation.Incoming inspection detected a hole in # 2 remote control button cover.No defects were noted on the distal body.Since the nozzle was not returned, an evaluation on the nozzle could not be conducted to determine its condition or root cause of the event.Repairs were performed on the video gastroscope which was successively shipped to the customer.Based on the information received from the complainant and the pentax inspectional findings, pentax determined the cause or most probable cause of the event to include, but not limited to, the following: not enough glue/adhesive on the nozzle.During reprocessing, cleaning in and around the nozzle may have caused the glue/adhesive to become weak.During the cleaning process, excessive pressure of air or water forced down the channels could cause the tightness integrity of the nozzle to the distal body to become weak and fall off during use when air/water was needed.A device history review was performed on 03/31/2016 confirming the video gastroscope was manufactured under normal conditions, passed all required inspections, and was released accordingly.Also, there were no reworks or concessions and the dates of approval for shipment and actual date shipped were confirmed.No further information has been received for this event, therefore pentax medical considers this medwatch report closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENTAX
Type of Device
VIDEO GASTROSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE
tsutsujigaoka 1-1-110
akishima-shi
tokyo, 196-0 012
JA  196-0012
Manufacturer (Section G)
HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE
tsutsujigaoka 1-1-110
akishima-shi
tokyo, 196-0 012
JA   196-0012
Manufacturer Contact
krishna govindarajan
3 paragon drive
montvale, NJ 07645
8004315880
MDR Report Key5671249
MDR Text Key45701595
Report Number9610877-2016-00047
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K131902
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/20/2016,07/10/2012
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/23/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEG-2990I
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/12/2012
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA05/20/2016
Distributor Facility Aware Date07/10/2012
Device Age5 YR
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer05/20/2016
Date Manufacturer Received07/10/2012
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-