• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82094-01
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Difficult To Position (1467); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
Patient Problems Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Embolism (1829)
Event Date 05/23/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The reported patient effect of embolism is a known, observed and potential patient effect as listed in the xact instructions for use.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties, subsequent patient effects and additional treatments are due to case circumstances.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.The emboshield nav6 device referenced is filed under a separate medwatch mfr number.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a heavily calcified ostial left common carotid (lcc) artery stenting procedure, after placement of the emboshield nav6, embolic protection device (epd), the 7x30 xact stent was positioned and ready to be deployed.Somehow, the stent deployed mostly in the aorta with only a small portion in the lcc ostium.As a result, nothing could get past the implanted stent, including the retrieval catheter for the epd; therefore, the epd was pulled through the stent to the retrieval catheter.However, the epd caught on the stent, dislodging it.The dislodged stent then floated downstream.The carotid intervention was completed with a non-abbott stent and the dislodged xact stent was pulled with a balloon to the iliac bifurcation where it was embedded in the vessel wall with a non-abbott stent.There was no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay in procedure.There was no additional information provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5707724
MDR Text Key46855010
Report Number2024168-2016-03745
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040038
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/08/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/08/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number82094-01
Device Lot Number6011261
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/23/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
Patient Weight73
-
-