• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problems Image Display Error/Artifact (1304); Failure to Sense (1559)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/13/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported to a company representative that a surgeon reported a failure to detect a heart rate with a model 106 generator.The patient had a successful pre-screening.It was determined that a sensitivity of 1 was appropriate.During the implant, the surgeon tried all the sensitivity settings and could only get "????" and a brief heartrate detection.The rate displayed for a few brief seconds before the "????" appeared again.The device was not implanted.A second generator was used and the impedance upon diagnostics was indicated to be within normal limits.The generator has been received for analysis, which is underway, but has not been completed to-date.Additional relevant information has not been received to-date.
 
Event Description
Analysis was completed for the returned generator.The report of undersensing was duplicated in the lab.The pulse generator was placed in a final test fixture.The stimulus (waveform generator) and pulse generator were connected to an oscilloscope for visual confirmation of pulse generator sensing the stimulus.Heart beat sensitivity setting two (as received) was evaluated with a no load and 2k load conditions.The pulse generator's sensing response observed showed sense delay starts of 8.2 seconds with a no load condition and 6.0 seconds with a 2k load condition.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The pulse generator was opened.Possible contaminates were observed on the trimmed edge of the printed circuit board assembly.The battery was removed.The pulse generator module was subjected to an electrical test.Results show that the pulse generator module failed several electrical tests; supply current 2ma/normal, supply current off, supply current off sense, trim diagon current.The pulse generator was instrumented in order to evaluate the delay in producing a heartbeat detection synch pulse.This synch pulse is received by the tablet and used to calculate the heartbeat rate.Test results of the synch pulse revealed a longer delay (from initiation of the hb detection algorithm until hb synch pulses occur) than what is expected.Remaining residual material on the printed circuit board assembly edge after the ¿test tab¿ removal during the manufacturing process may have been the contributing factor for the report of undersensing.Review of the downloaded data revealed no anomalies.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5708939
MDR Text Key48134102
Report Number1644487-2016-01293
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/13/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/09/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/07/2017
Device Model Number106
Device Lot Number203421
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/02/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received06/22/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/16/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age30 YR
-
-