A manufacturer representative reported on (b)(6) 2016 that a consumer stated stimulation was remaining on even after stimulation had been turned off.The representative turned stimulation to 0 and off, and the consumer still felt residuals.The first occurrence of this was three (3) days post-surgery for a few hours, and the other/second occurrence was still in progress for several days.It was noted that the consumer turned stimulation off on (b)(6) 2016 and had been feeling stimulation for the past three days.Information received from the representative on (b)(6) 2016 reported he would be seeing the consumer, as she continued to feel stimulation, but positional.She felt stronger stimulation when she laid down and felt the appropriate stimulation coverage, but it was irritating.The representative confirmed stimulation was off with the clinician and patient programmers.The consumer's doctor ordered an mri, as the consumer continued to feel stimulation and the stimulator was off.Troubleshooting reviewed device data and noted the last clinician programmer session was (b)(6) 2016 and noted five (5) recharge sessions captured between (b)(6).Three were short between 2-6 minutes long, and the other two were 41 and 57 minutes long.Since (b)(6) 2016, the consumer had stimulation off briefly on (b)(6), but stimulation was turned back on shortly thereafter (in less than 1 minute).No impedances were done.Since the consumer had not been implanted for that long, it was reviewed to consider that positioning of the leads was creating a sense of stimulation.Indication for use included spinal pain.
|