• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97712
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Itching Sensation (1943); Pain (1994); Skin Irritation (2076); Reaction (2414)
Event Date 01/28/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Information references the main component of the system and other applicable components are: product id: 97791, product type: accessory.Product id: 977a275, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2016, product type: lead.Product id: 977a275, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2016, product type: lead.Product id: 97791, product type: accessory.Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is completed.
 
Event Description
A consumer implanted for complex regional pain syndrome type i and spinal pain reported via the manufacturer's representative (rep) that since therapy was turned on a week after implant, they experienced itching from head to toe after stimulation had been on for a while.When the consumer turned therapy off the sensation went away.The rep.Tried changing the rate, but it didn't resolve the issue.Additional information received from the manufacturer's representative (rep) reported no further diagnostic tests had been performed and they didn't think the cause had been determined.The rep.Wasn't sure if any interventions had taken place, but the consumer was supposed to see the physician the week of may 16th.The device was later explanted and returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (s/n (b)(4)) found no anomaly.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the manufacturer's representative (rep) reported that prior to explant the consumer experienced pain and itching at the implantable neurostimulator (ins) site when stimulation was turned on.As a result they had been unable to use it due to reports of increased itching and sensitivity at the site whenever it was turned on.These issues resulted in an unscheduled clinic visit where the consumer was diagnosed with pruritus and was instructed to continue applying lidocaine 5% topical appointment three times every day to the implantable neurostimulator (ins) site for sensitivity and pain.The event resolved without sequelae on (b)(6) 2016 after the device removed.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient that reported that whenever the patient had her stimulation turned on, she had experienced severe itching.She had a really bad reaction only when the stimulation was on.When the stimulation was turned off she was fine.The patient had a full system explant and now the itching has resolved.It was noted that the patient had a knee replacement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(device evaluated): product event summary #the ins was returned and analysis found no anomaly.Evaluation determined that there was no allegation of a device failure, but standard investigation is needed because the event was determined to be reportable to a regulatory body.The source information indicates a potential relationship between the adverse event(s) reported and the device therapy.Assessment determined that there is not an existing formal investigation for the issue identified in this event.However, a formal investigation is not needed because the issue identified in this event is a known inherent risk as disclosed in product labeling, and additional investigation is not needed.Supporting event information used to determine the issue was a known event includes that the patient had the system explanted due to pain at the implantable neurostimulator pocket; however the root cause of why the patient experienced itching and sensitivity with the implant on remains unknown since the device was explanted and analysis found no indication of an anomaly.
 
Event Description
Device evaluated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected information: sex, date of birth.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key5731970
MDR Text Key47594317
Report Number3004209178-2016-12418
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/13/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/17/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/14/2016
Device Model Number97712
Device Catalogue Number97712
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/16/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/26/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
-
-