• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG LOCKING SCREWS, SELF DRILLING, 2.0X8MM, 5/P; IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG LOCKING SCREWS, SELF DRILLING, 2.0X8MM, 5/P; IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 50-20598
Device Problems Break (1069); Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/23/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been received at the manufacturer for testing.An evaluation will be conducted, and a follow-up report will be submitted after the quality investigation is complete.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the company representative that during a medical procedure, the surgeon implanted arch bars and began putting wires on the bars.When the surgeon was tightening the wires, the head of hmmf screw fractured off.The case proceeded with no further complications and was completed successfully.A "hall" drill was used to remove the remaining screw shaft of the broken screw.The surgeon was using stryker products correctly, per ifu standards.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was returned for investigation and the reported event could be confirmed.The investigation shows that the screw broke as a result of too high torsional forces in forced rupture mode during the insertion.The broken shaft/tip of the screw was very strongly damaged during the removal from the patient.The fracture surface shows the typical flow structures of ductile torsional breakages.The root cause of the failure could have been a too hard bone.The screw could have been weakened during the insertion, because of too high torsional forces on the screw.Finally when the wiring was applied the shear force increased and the screw head finally broke off.Furthermore in the related risk management file these possible root causes were stated: - incorrectly selected/ assembled implant/ instrument - insufficient/too high bone quality - wrong/ missing information - implant/instrument mix-up - improper implant placement - too much/ wrong forces between blade, screw and bone (e.G.Screw head deformation, screw breakage) - power tool usage for screw insertion (except qdm) - too much/ wrong compression/ torsional/ axial forces - bone quality resulting in high torque - powered screw insertion with right angled screwdriver.Based on the evaluation no indications for any design, material or manufacturing related problems were found in this investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the company representative that during a medical procedure, the surgeon implanted arch bars and began putting wires on the bars.When the surgeon was tightening the wires, the head of hmmf screw fractured off.The case proceeded with no further complications and was completed successfully.A "hall" drill was used to remove the remaining screw shaft of the broken screw.The surgeon was using styrker products correctly, per ifu standards.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOCKING SCREWS, SELF DRILLING, 2.0X8MM, 5/P
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG
boetzingerstr. 41
freiburg D-791 11
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG
boetzingerstr. 41
freiburg D-791 11
Manufacturer Contact
kelli dykstra
boetzingerstr. 41
freiburg D-791-11
76145120
MDR Report Key5735980
MDR Text Key48724916
Report Number0008010177-2016-00132
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DZL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122313
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/20/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number50-20598
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/09/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/24/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-