MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LOUISVILLE) 150 MM DISPOSABLE PIN; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 9733236 |
Device Problem
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
Patient Problems
Spinal Column Injury (2081); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Iatrogenic Source (2498)
|
Event Date 05/30/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient information was requested but has not been provided.The device was returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Perc pin fit into the perc cross pin reference frame with no issues.Found external damage to the perc pin due to pliers being used by customer to extract pin from ilium mount which would not contribute to the cause of the failure.The device was found to be fully functional with no problem found.The reported event could not be duplicated by medtronic personnel.Medtronic navigation is filing this mdr to ensure visibility to a patient event as a result of a procedure that utilized a medtronic navigation product.There is no allegation to suggest that the navigation system or instrumentation caused or contributed to the reported event.
|
|
Event Description
|
A medtronic representative reported that "during posterior spinal fusion, an attempt to place the percutaneous pin 150mm to the ilium and attach a cross pin frame was made.The percutaneous pin was advanced about 1 cm, but it was so hard ,and the pin could not be advanced further, nor pulled out.The percutaneous pin 150mm was pulled out forcibly using pliers, and it was replaced with a percutaneous pin 100mm and another attempt was made.Then the pin could be advanced and the cross pin frame was attached successfully.The procedure was completed using navigation.No patient impact has been reported." medtronic navigation is filing this mdr to ensure visibility to a patient event as a result of a procedure that utilized a medtronic navigation product.There is no allegation to suggest that the navigation system or instrumentation caused or contributed to the reported event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A medtronic representative reported that a new hole and incision were not required for the second insertion of the perc pin.They changed to another pin for the second attempt.Per this new information, a revision surgery was not necessary, there was no change to the surgical approach, and there was no reported impact to the patient.If this information was available during submission of the initial mdr it would not have been considered an adverse event.The above fields were corrected to reflect that the reported incident was associated with a product problem type of mdr.Per further hardware engineering review, analysis confirmed the physical damage due to the pliers being used on the device but was unable to confirm a failure that would cause "the pin could not be advanced further, nor pulled out." a review of the instructions for use (ifu) that accompanies the device found that the ifu instructs the user to select the appropriate size percutaneous pin (use the shortest pin that reaches bone through the surrounding tissue).Based on the reported event the site staff did not select the "appropriate size" and was unsuccessful in placing the incorrect pin size.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|