It was reported that during a procedure performed in the (b)(6) on (b)(6) 2016, after placement of the locking screw in two 6.5mm x 45mm long arm polyaxial screws (slpl6545), the surgeon applied torque to the cap screw and when the anti-torque wrench was removed the tulip of both screws was opened laterally and the cap screw came out.Both polyaxial screws were removed and replaced with slp6545 6.5mm x 45mm polyaxial screw long arm.There was a delay of 30 minutes as a result of the reported issue.
|
Engineering evaluation notes the threads of both polyaxial screw are partially sheared off and severely damaged.The images of the lock screws are most informative in that they display wear around the outer edge of the rod contact surface and the upper thread contact surfaces exhibit no signs of wear.The lock screw images indicate that both lock screws were not making flush contact with the rods, and that they did not fully seat in the polyaxial screws.The lock screw marring patterns indicate that the rods were skewed relative to the poly-axial screw's tulip component during the tightening process and remained skewed throughout the tightening process.As the lock screws were rotated during tightening their bottom outer edge contacted the rod and the outer edge was marred as a result of the misaligned condition.The degree to which this misaligned condition existed is believed to have been substantial since the lack of marring on the lock screw upper threads.Potential causes for the observed condition include but are not limited to rod contouring / construct configuration issues, multiaxial mechanism is bound up and not functioning (tulip cannot rotate to attain proper alignment), the polyaxial tulip is levered on during final tightening to prevent proper alignment from being achieved.The polyaxial screws may have been at their full range of motion and may not have been able to rotate further to attain proper orientation to clamp the rod due to the rod contour.If the multi-axial mechanism was rigidly bound up in a fixed orientation this may have prevented attaining proper rod - tulip orientation.Compressing across screws during the final tightening or inadvertent levering during final tightening may also have prevented the proper alignment of components to occur.The cause for the thread damage appears to stem from a misaligned tulip-rod condition that existed and was not overcome during the tightening process.Review of manufacturing history records found a total of 99 pieces released for distribution on 6/7/2013 with no deviation or anomalies.A three-year complaint history review (1.1.2013 - 6.7.2016) did not find any previous reports of this nature for the reported lot.The exact root cause cannot be determined.No product no-conformance, manufacturing or design issue was identified.As the root cause appears to be technique related, the need for corrective action was not indicated.This report is number 1 of 2 mdrs filed for the same event (reference 3005739886-2016-00032-1 / 00033-1).
|