Catalog Number 388.038 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Date 06/13/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No reported patient or direct surgical involvement.Device is an instrument and is not implanted or explanted.The complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned.Device history record review: manufacturing date: week 41, year 2005.The device history record is no longer available due to the age of the instrument (over 10 years old).Therefore, the exact date of manufacture is unknown.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the tip of a crimper for transconnector broke during sterile processing on (b)(6) 2016.The tiny fragmented tip of the device could not been found.As the breakage occurred prior to a surgery, no direct patient or procedural involvement has been associated with the event.The product's malfunction did not delay the start of the procedure.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The subject device is currently undergoing investigation; the results are pending completion.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product investigation summary: the returned instrument was examined and the complaint condition was confirmed as both of the bottom distal prongs were bent and one prong was broken off.No definitive root cause was able to be determined; however, the failure mode is likely contributable to the application of excessive force/rough handling over 10 years in the field.A visual inspection under 5x magnification, a device history record (dhr) review, and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.The crimper for transconnector is utilized in both the synapse and axon systems to lock transconnectors after implantation.The relevant drawings for the returned instrument were reviewed: top-level.The design, materials, and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of these devices.No new, unique, or different patient harms were identified as a result of this evaluation.The returned part was determined to be suitable for the intended use when employed and maintained as recommended.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|