• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVA CRAGG-MCNAMARA; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVA CRAGG-MCNAMARA; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Death (1802)
Event Date 01/01/2015
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Event found from review of literature.Objective: thrombolysis and open surgical revascularization are current options for the treatment of acute limb ischemia (ali).Despite the several randomized controlled trials comparing the two options, no single treatment can yet be recommended as a universal initial management of ali.The purpose of this study was to evaluate contemporary endovascular and surgical revascularization for ali.Methods: consecutive patients with ali treated with endovascular revascularization (er) or open revascularization (or) between 2005 and 2011 were identified and reviewed.Procedural success and outcomes were compared between the two groups.Limb salvage and survival were assessed by time-to-event methods, including kaplan-meier estimation and competing-risks regression models.Results: a total of 154 limbs were treated in 147 patients in the er group, compared with 326 limbs in 296 patients in the or group.The mean follow-up was 14 6 18.5 months.The majority of patients presented with rutherford ii ischemia (83% for or, 90% for er).In rutherford ii patients, technical success was achieved in 90.7% of the or group vs 79.9% of the er group (p [.002), with amputation rates of 10.0% vs 7.2% (p [.35) at 30 days and 16.3% vs 13.0% (p [.37) at 1 year, respectively.In rutherford ii patients with failed bypass graft, technical success rate was 95.0% (or) vs 75.0% (er) (p [.001), whereas the amputation rate was 6.3% vs 15.38% (p [.13) at 30 days and 24.1% vs 23.1% (p [.90) at 1 year, respectively.The overall 30-day mortality rate was 13.2% (or) and 5.4% (er) (p [.012).Overall amputation rates were 13.5% (or) vs 6.5% (er) at 30 days (p [.023) and 19.6% (or) vs 13.0% (er) at 1 year (p [.074).The primary patency rate was 57% (or) and 51% (er) at 1 year (p [.74).Predictors of limb loss by life-table analysis included coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [hr], 2.0; p [.007) and rutherford category iii (hr, 19.0; p <(><<)>.001).Predictors of death by life-table analysis included age (hr, 1.03; p <(><<)>.001), end-stage renal disease (hr, 7.28; p <(><<)>.001), cancer (hr, 1.65; p [.005), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hr, 1.61; p [.005).Patients for whom lysis failed and who were not candidates for bypass surgery required major amputation (10 limbs); one was treated with observation, whereas four patients (six limbs) died.Conclusions: in patients presenting with class ii ali, er or surgical or resulted in comparable limb salvage rates.Although technical success is higher with or for patients presenting with failed bypass grafts, the amputation rates are comparable.Overall mortality rates are significantly higher at 30 days and 1 year in the or group.In general, cdt was conducted with standard wire and catheter techniques to embed a multi-sidehole catheter (cragg-mcnamara; ev3 endovascular inc, (b)(4); or unifuse; angiodynamics, (b)(4)) into the thrombosed arterial segment.Thirty limbs in the er group failed thrombolysis because of inadequate response in 26 limbs (13 of them were treated with successful bypass surgery), intraoperative bleeding events in three limbs, and failure to cross the thrombosed vessel in one limb.Required major amputation (10 limbs); one was treated with observation, whereas four patients (six limbs) died.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CRAGG-MCNAMARA
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVA
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 NEUROVA
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key5755465
MDR Text Key48343058
Report Number2029214-2016-00462
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K964868
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/29/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/28/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/29/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-