• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310030
Device Problems Defective Component (2292); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/20/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Age at time of event: 18 years or older.Device evaluated by mfr.: device was returned for analysis.On visual inspection it was noted that the catheter sheath was damaged.The advancer knob upon return was in a midways position; it was advanced in order to inspect the handshake connection.The handshake connection was inspected and the no issues were noted.A handshake connection test was attempted to examine the integrity of the connection and no issues were noted.The drive shaft and coil were inspected and there was no damage noted.An attempt was made to functionally test the complaint unit, however, no speed was achieved.The device was dismantled and a melted ultem was evident.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause has been determined to be use/user error as the dfu states: ¿never operate the rotablator advancer without saline infusion.Flowing saline is essential for cooling and lubricating the working parts of the advancer.Operation of the advancer without proper saline infusion may result in permanent damage to the advancer.¿ (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 01jun2016.It was reported that sheath damaged and not reaching optimum speed occurred.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely tortuous and severely calcified proximal left anterior descending artery.A 1.50mm rotalink¿ plus was used to treat the target lesion.The device was prepared and rotational speed was set up outside the patient.An attempt was made to set the rotational speed to 190,000 rpm, but it stopped increasing at 175,000 rpm and gradually decreased to 130,000 rpm.Setting up of speed was stopped and the device was checked, and it was noted that the drive shaft sheath was damaged.The procedure was completed with another 1.50mm rotalink¿ plus.No patient complications reported and patient condition was good.However, device analysis revealed that the sheath was torn/split.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5756111
MDR Text Key48403797
Report Number2134265-2016-05483
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/01/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/28/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2017
Device Model NumberH749236310030
Device Catalogue Number23631-003
Device Lot Number17761860
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/02/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/01/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/09/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-