• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EKOS CORPORATION EKOSONIC ENDOVASCULAR CATHETER; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EKOS CORPORATION EKOSONIC ENDOVASCULAR CATHETER; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 500-56140
Device Problems Device Alarm System (1012); Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/05/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Although the device broke externally in this case, there is potential harm, were the distal fractured fragment to remain in the patient.The complaint product and data event log were returned to ekos for evaluation.Review of the event log shows that three (3) types of alarms occurred between 13 to 17 hours in the therapy session for this patient.The total therapy time was 18 hours.Returned product was observed under microscope.This microscopic inspection reveals a reduced cross sectional area in the junction of the microsonic device (msd).This likely occurs due to kink during placement/advancement or non-compliant situation post-procedure.When ekos representative enquired, complainant could not confirm either of the aforementioned two scenarios.The kink most likely contributed to the alarms.Review of the manufacturing records indicate that the product was manufactured according to specifications and met all release criteria.Therefore, a definitive cause is not identifiable at this time.The product ifu contains a warning statement pertaining to kinking - " do not deform or kink the msd during delivery into the iddc.If the msd is kinked at any time, do not attempt to use the msd as kinking may lead to degraded performance or fracture during use." ekos follow up indicates that the clinician had great end result.
 
Event Description
The report concerns a patient of unknown age and gender who underwent ekosonic for the treatment of a peripheral artery occlusion (le pao).No details of the patients medical history or concomitant medications were reported.The reporter contacted the helpline via text message due to a 'msd withdrawn' alarm being noted on the ekos control unit after eighteen (18) hours of therapy.The helpline contacted the reporting establishment and confirmed that the ultra sound core (usc) was hubbed and that the catheter had not been recently flushed at the time of the alarm.The reporter stated that during the removal procedure of the usc that it broke into two (2) pieces after being removed from the patient.The reporter was unable to confirm if any difficulty had been experienced during the placement of the device or whether the patient had remained compliant (laid still) during the duration fo the therapy.The reporter stated that the patient 'got a great ekos result and the usc wire did not harm the patient in any way' (verbatim).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EKOSONIC ENDOVASCULAR CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
EKOS CORPORATION
11911 north creek parkway s.
bothell WA 98011 8809
Manufacturer (Section G)
EKOS CORPORATION
11911 north creek parkway s.
bothell WA 98011 8809
Manufacturer Contact
benjamin hornsey
11911 north creek parkway s.
bothell, WA 98011-8809
4254153143
MDR Report Key5765863
MDR Text Key48715303
Report Number3001627457-2016-00018
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K140151
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/05/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/01/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date08/15/2018
Device Catalogue Number500-56140
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/16/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/05/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/10/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-