(b)(4).There has not been a lot number reported and therefore we are unable to conclusively determine if the product was part of a recall.Although, we are unable to obtain the lot number, a sales and shipping search was performed and it was identified that the patient received (4) lots affected by the recall.It is not currently known if the reported event is related to a lot affected by the recall that had been shipped to the complainant.The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental medwatch report will be submitted upon completion of this activity.Clinical investigation: the patient medical records were provided by the facility on (b)(6) 2016.A clinical investigation was performed to identify a causal relationship between the hemodialysis treatment and the adverse event.Based on a total of 60 pages of provided patient medical records this (b)(6) old, male, end stage renal disease (esrd) patient has been on home hemodialysis (hhd) therapy every other day, for the past four years.Medical records did not contain hhd treatment records for the month of (b)(6) 2014.Medical records did contain a dialysis rounds note dated (b)(6) 2014.The dialysis adequacy assessment did identify the patient's blood pressure as being too high and addressed this with the patient.The pth level was also reported as too high and noted poor glycemic control of diabetes.The patient's phosphorus level was identified as higher this month then previous month; an adjustment in the patient's medication was made.Additionally, the dialysis round dated (b)(6) 2014 noted that the patient had symptoms of a urinary tract infection and was treated with the antibiotic levaquin (every other day for 5 doses).No medical records for april (b)(6) were received to make a temporal relationship between the patient's sepsis and the exposure to recalled lots of naturalyte liquid bicarbonate.The bacteria in the recalled lots of naturalyte liquid bicarbonate was identified as halomonas (species 1, 2, & 3) a gram negative bacteria.The lab report for the patient's blood culture drawn and reported on (b)(6) 2016 was enterococcus a gram positive cocci indicating two different organisms.Therefore, based on the provided lab cultures, no causal relationship was identified.Additionally, the patient's nurse reported to have pulled the recalled naturalyte liquid bicarbonate lots from the patient prior to any of the lots being used.There is no documentation in the medical record supporting a possible association of reported sepsis and the exposure to recalled lots of naturalyte liquid bicarbonate.This determination is strengthened by the bacterial organisms identified in the lab cultures of the patient's blood and the confirmation from the nurse that the recalled naturalyte liquid bicarbonate lots were pulled from the patient's available stock prior to being used.
|
Medical records from an unrelated event report the patient was prescribed antibiotics for sepsis.Relevant medical records and follow up communication found this to have been diagnosed (b)(6) 2014.The patient had received recalled lots of liquid bicarbonate from the 2014 recall, and it is unknown if they were used by the patient.However, according to the home therapies nurse (htrn), the patient's culture results revealed the presence of halomonas gram negative bacteria, which does not pertain to the recalled naturalyte liquid bicarbonate.The patient has since recovered and was reported as currently doing well.
|