• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK MENISCAL APPLIER, OMNISPAN; MENISCAL INSTRUMENTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK MENISCAL APPLIER, OMNISPAN; MENISCAL INSTRUMENTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 228143
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 06/13/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).Associated medwatch 1221934-2016-10272.
 
Event Description
The sales rep reported that during a meniscal repair procedure after pressing the first gray trigger the customer's meniscal deployment 12 degree gun and the customer's omnispan meniscal repair, both implants fired at the same time and the silicone sheath pulled off the needle.The sales rep reported that the surgeon completed the procedure by performing a meniscectomy and removing part of the meniscus.The sales rep reported that there was a 15 minute delay in the case.The sales rep stated that the device was loaded properly and that the doctor has plenty of experience with the devices.The sales rep stated that the needle did not penetrate the meniscus.The sales rep is not sure if the failure is due to the gun or the implants.The device will be returning for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: the complaint device was not returned for evaluation.A root cause cannot be determined; however, one possible root cause is the failure mode results when main pusher rod is bent upwards; the failure mode is due to the interference of the bent pusher rod with the 2nd implant during deployment.This bent rod will push the 2nd implant and 1st implant from the needle, thus deploying both implants.Based on the information provided and the devices that were returned we cannot confirm this complaint.A batch record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed one similar complaint for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).Associated medwatch 1221934-2016-10272.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MENISCAL APPLIER, OMNISPAN
Type of Device
MENISCAL INSTRUMENTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
jason busch
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088808210
MDR Report Key5787646
MDR Text Key49362597
Report Number1221934-2016-10273
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/13/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/12/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2017
Device Catalogue Number228143
Device Lot Number3825914
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer06/13/2016
Date Manufacturer Received07/25/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-