Catalog Number SE-05-060-120-6F |
Device Problems
Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Physical Resistance (2578); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 06/13/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.The unk supera device referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch mfr number.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported the procedure was to treat an in-stent restenosis of a supera in the mid-distal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Balloon angioplasty was performed on the restenosis, at which time a dissection occurred under the supera stent.The decision was made to place another supera stent in the distal part of the sfa, overlapping the previously implanted supera stent.The 5 x 60 supera was advanced, but met resistance and the stent was pushed forward out of the catheter due to the pushing, the stent released before the release button was used.The stent was 1 1/2 cm still in the shaft and folded back for 1 cm.An extra balloon was used to dilate the section that was folded back of the stent.The patient is now under close monitoring in case of issues occurring in that area.Although it was reported there was a delay due to the additional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta), the delay was not clinically significant as there was no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual and dimensional inspections were performed on the returned device.The premature deployment was not confirmed as the stent had already been deployed.The resistance was unable to be confirmed as it was based on case circumstances.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history reviewed no other similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties and additional treatment was due to case circumstances.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|