The device was not returned to edwards for evaluation as patient has (b)(6).The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Based on the information received the cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient factors likely contributed to the event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
Edwards received information that a 21mm aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of eleven (11) years, twenty-nine (29) days, due to stenosis, regurgitation, and pannus.The noncoronary leaflet on the prosthetic valve appeared to be thrombosed and had some thickening, as well as appeared to be torn.The explanted device was replaced with a 23mm aortic valve.The patient tolerated the procedure well and was transported to the surgical intensive care unit in stable condition.
|