• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0620-A
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult To Position (1467); Premature Activation (1484)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/15/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure for a gastrointestinal (gi) bleed using ruby coils.During the procedure, while attempting to reposition the last ruby coil into the target vessel, the physician was advancing and retracting the coil, then realized that the coil had unintentionally detached inside the patient.Therefore, the physician required a snare device to remove the detached ruby coil from the celiac artery and the aorta.Subsequently, approximately ninety percent of the coil was removed and approximately three centimeters of residual coil remained in the common hepatic artery.It was reported that the remaining residual coil was likely of no clinical significance to the patient.The procedure ended at this point with no additional coils placed.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.Following the procedure, the patient did well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the ruby coil pusher assembly; the stretch resistant wire (sr wire) was fractured and the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.The proximal constraint sphere was inside the distal detachment tip (ddt).The introducer sheath was loaded incorrectly on the pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the ruby coil¿s sr wire was fractured.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the ruby coil is forcefully retracted during repositioning against resistance, damage such as this may occur.The introducer sheath loaded incorrectly on the pusher assembly was likely incidental and may have occurred during packaging of the device for return.All penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key5798305
MDR Text Key49658757
Report Number3005168196-2016-00994
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013183
UDI-Public00814548013183
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/15/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2023
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0620-A
Device Lot NumberF63040
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/04/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/10/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/11/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age86 YR
-
-