Method: visual analysis, device history review, complaint history review, risk assessment.Result: manufacturing records were reviewed for the corresponding lot and no relevant issues were identified.The stryker rep was unable to obtain any additional information on the case.A possible root cause of this device failure could stem from patient activity, however, this could not be confirmed by the stryker rep.Another possible cause of failure is fatigue of the device, due to the length of implantation, as the device was implanted long enough to allow the patient to fuse.This is the intention of the device; therefore, the device can be removed, as the presence of the device is no longer required, as stated in the referenced instructions for use (referenced in labelling review).As the device was implanted for approximately two years, the device would have undergone normal loading cycles and fatigue, which could have contributed to the device failure; the instructions for use.Conclusion: the plausible root cause cannot be confirmed; therefore, the root cause is not determined and is multi-factorial.
|