• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Vasoconstriction (2126)
Event Date 06/16/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The stent remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The 5.5x120mm supera stent referenced is filed under a separate medwatch report number.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2016, a 5.5x120mm supera stent was implanted in the right superficial femoral artery (sfa), moderately to heavily calcified lesion without issue.Post procedure, the patient was placed on three different antiplatelet therapy medications.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient presented with ankle pain.A 5.5x150mm supera stent was implanted in the left sfa.Following, spasms were noted in the 5.5x150mm supera stent.Medication was provided and balloon angioplasty performed for the spasms.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient was hospitalized with right leg knee and shin pain.Per computerized tomography (ct) imaging, there was decreased blood flow in the right leg, containing the 5.5x120mm supera stent.On (b)(6) 2016, per right leg imaging, the brachio index was 0.2.The patient was admitted to the hospital and a catheter with fibrinolysis properties was inserted.On (b)(6) 2016, per angiography, blood clots were noted proximal to the 5.5x120mm supera stent.The catheter was removed and thrombectomy was performed.Following, 90% re-stenosis was noted in the 5.5x120mm supera stent and the stent appeared twisted.Balloon angioplasty was performed.A herculink elite was placed as treatment.Good results were noted.The patient was placed on coumadin.The event resolved without sequela.The patient was discharged from the hospital over the (b)(6).There was no additional information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot numbers were not provided.The reported patient effect of vasoconstriction, as listed in the supera, instructions for use (ifu), is a known patient effect.Based on the case information and related record review, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined and there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot numbers were not provided.The reported patient effect of thrombosis and restenosis, as listed in the supera, instructions for use (ifu), are known patient effects.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined and the treatment appears to be related to the circumstances of the procedure.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the previously filed medwatch report, the additional information was obtained: on (b)(6) 2016, the 4.5x80mm supera stent was implanted across the left popliteal lesion without complication and a non-abbott stent was implanted in the left superficial femoral artery (sfa).The procedure was performed with no complications and successful stenting.On (b)(6) 2016, per imaging, the left popliteal 4.5x80mm (not 5.5x150) supera stent placed on (b)(6) 2016, had totally occluded.Additional heparin was provided and balloon angioplasty was performed.A small amount of thrombus was observed and the lesion had become spasmodic.Mild plaque was noted between the (b)(6) 2016 left popliteal and left sfa stents.Nitroglycerine was provided and additional balloon angioplasty was performed.A 5.5x120mm supera stent was implanted across the left popliteal lesion without difficulty.Post dilatation was performed.A small amount of residual thrombus, distal to the stent was noted.The procedure was tolerated well.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5821198
MDR Text Key50390330
Report Number2024168-2016-04931
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P120020
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/25/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/02/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient Weight53
-
-