• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; NAIL, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; NAIL, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Bent (1059)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment not diagnosis.Porat, s., simanovsky, n., simanovsky, n., tair, m.Removal of flexible titanium nails in children (2006) j pediatr orthop, vol 26, no 2, pp:188-192.This report is for an unknown flexible titanium nail.(other number) udi: unknown part number, udi is unavailable.(b)(4).Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no devices were returned and no lot numbers or part numbers were provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following journal article: porat, s., simanovsky, n., simanovsky, n., tair, m.Removal of flexible titanium nails in children (2006) j pediatr orthop, vol 26, no 2, pp:188-192.This study analyzed the removal of one specific type of implant: flexible titanium nails (embrochage centro-medullaire elastique stable; depuy int., (b)(4)), used for diaphyseal fractures of the femur or forearm bones, which are often treated with titanium flexible nails.The purpose of this study was to analyze the indications for this procedure and its complications, and to discuss its justification.Medical records and radiographs of 143 children who underwent flexible titanium nail removal between 1998 and 2002 were retrospectively reviewed.Patient age ranged from 4 to 17 years.Data were collected regarding the indication for fixation, the time from fixation to nail removal, the difficulty of nail removal, the operative time, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.A (b)(6) boy who underwent a fracture reduction and fixation with a titanium nail.Two (2) months later the boy showed clinical and radiographic healing, however was hit by a car and had suffered refracture with nails bending.One (1) month later he underwent closed reduction of refracture and exchange of the nails.A (b)(6) boy who had two refractures of the diaphyses of the radius and ulna for two separate incidents of falling down while playing basketball was treated and suffered from refracture with nails in situ as a result of falling down again while playing basketball.This time we failed to retrieve the nails due to the very strong bonding, and he was treated with open reduction of the fractures and compressive plating of both bones.The second patient from the forearm group was a (b)(6) boy in whom we failed to retrieve the nails after a refracture, 3 years after the initial treatment of the fractures.In another case, nonelective nail removal was performed due to a nonunion of the diaphyseal fracture of the ulna.The nails were removed and the fracture was treated by compression plating, and it healed well.In 139 patients, elective removal of the nails was scheduled when sound healing of the fracture was confirmed by two-plane radiographs.Nail protrusion under the skin and pain or discomfort were the indications for nail removal in 12 children (13%) in the femoral group and in 4 children (8%) in the forearm group.This report is for an unknown flexible titanium nail.This is report 1 of 4 for (b)(4).This medwatch will address the (b)(6) boy who underwent a fracture reduction and fixation with a titanium nail.Two (2) months later the boy showed clinical and radiographic healing, however was hit by a car and had suffered refracture with nails bending.One (1) month later he underwent closed reduction of refracture and exchange of the nails.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
NAIL, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
terry callahan
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5833381
MDR Text Key50750743
Report Number2520274-2016-13713
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/29/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/27/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age12 YR
-
-