A health care provider (hcp) reported the patient had been symptomatic again with a return of symptoms and a panic attack.The patient use deep brain stimulation (dbs) for obsessive compulsive disorder (ocd).The hcp suspected the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was depleted or nearing depletion based on the patient's parameters, a longevity calculation, and their return of symptoms.The symptoms suddenly returned in (b)(6) 2015.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient met with their hcp after having a panic attack.The hcp checked the ins, saw the settings and that the ins was on so they figured that was the output being given to the patient.The hcp decided to adjust the patient's medication and not the ins.The ins was working at the appointment on (b)(6) 2015.The ins went dead without the patient being aware so they had a "pretty rough two weeks." the patient thought the ins depleted sometime after (b)(6) 2015.A longevity calculated estimated the ins to reach end of service (eos) after 11.3 months.An eos message was displayed when the ins was interrogated on (b)(6) 2015.The hcp had decided to do some programming since the old settings did not seem to be helping the patient anymore.The hcp wanted to move contact one to contact zero, but they could not since the ins was at eos.The ins was off/disabled and no longer providing therapy.The ins was programmed to 7v, 90 usec, and 135 hz with a therapy impedance of 850 ohms on one side and 7v, 90 usec, and 135 hz with a therapy impedance of 870 ohms on the other side.There were no indications of shorts in the circuits used for programming.The hcp planned to coordinate an ins replacement surgery.The ins was replaced two days later.The patient did not say they were upset with the ins longevity, but they had stated it was less than a year.Additional information was received from a health care provider (hcp).It was reported that the device was removed due to the implantable neurostimulator (ins) failing.
|