Since the patient weight was not included in the information about the adverse event, nakanishi received from the distributor on june 19, 2016, nakanishi sent the distributor an email for the information about the patient weight on (b)(6) 2016.According to the distributor, the dentist refused to provide the information.Due to the device not being returned from the distributor, an examination of the dhr for device (h265 sga-e2s 1:2 20 degree angle, serial no.(b)(4)) is the only investigation approach nakanishi inc., (b)(4) (manufacturer) can make.As a result of the examination, the dhr indicated that no problems had occurred during manufacturing and testing of the subject device.
|
On june 19, 2016, nakanishi received an email from a distributor ((b)(4)) stating that a patient was burned due to a handpiece overheating.Details are as follows.The event occurred on (b)(6) 2016.The dentist was sectioning a tooth during the extraction of wisdom teeth.The dentist was aware of the unit overheating during the procedure and found the handpiece had burned the inside of the patient's mouth.According to the dentist, the damage is a possible 2nd degree burn.The dentist applied burn ointment to the burn injury in the patient's mouth.When the patient visited the dental office on (b)(6) 2016, the dentist confirmed that the injury was still healing and was not expected to leave any permanent damage.
|