• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE POLYETHYLENE INLAY W/TANTALUM MARKER/MEDIUM-10MM-STERILE; PROSTHESIS INTERVERTEBRAL DISC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE POLYETHYLENE INLAY W/TANTALUM MARKER/MEDIUM-10MM-STERILE; PROSTHESIS INTERVERTEBRAL DISC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PDL-M-PT10S
Device Problem Fitting Problem (2183)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.(b)(6).(b)(4).Not implanted or explanted, device was ex-changed with another inlay.Device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Device history records review was conducted.The report indicates that the: dhr review for part #pdl-m-pt10s, lot #7803186, release to warehouse date: (b)(6) 2014, expiration date: sep 30, 2017, supplier: (b)(6).No ncrs were generated during production; review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an initial lumbar disc arthroplasty surgery on the l5, s1, that the superior and interior pro-disc end plates were implanted in the patient with a medium sized pro-disc holder.The surgeon then slide the poly-inlay down the tracks of the holder.The inlay kept popping off the tracks of the holder.The surgeon changed the one poly-inlay with another poly-inlay.The surgeon thought that the defective device was a poly-inlay.The surgeon then switched out the other implant holder, and that did not help.The surgeon kept working to make it function, and the inlay was finally implanted.The surgeon stated that there may be a defect in either the inlay or the two holders.The distance between the tracks may have been either narrower than it should have been, or that the surgeon was not getting the inlay on the track properly.There was about a 20 minute surgical delay.The procedure was completed successfully with no reports of medical intervention.The patient's post-operative status was noted to be stable.This complaint has 4 devices.Concomitant devices reported: part #-pdl-m-sp11s, lot #-7807317, quantity-((b)(4)); pdl-m-it00s, lot #-9911798, quantity-((b)(4)).This report is 1 of 4 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product investigation was completed: a device history record (dhr) review, visual inspection, partial functional test, and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.The complaint condition could not be confirmed and no functional or dimensional issues were identified with the returned parts.The returned parts were determined to be suitable for their intended use when employed and maintained as recommended.Thus, as no issues were identified with the returned devices, further investigation is not warranted.The returned medium inserter and medium polyethylene inlay implant are part of the prodisc-l total disc replacement system.The prodisc-l system is ¿intended to replace a diseased and/or degenerated intervertebral disc of the lumbosacral region¿ between l3 and s1.The inserter is used to insert the endplates and then used with the distractor and the inlay pusher to insert the polyethylene inlay.The inserters and implant were received intact with surface wear consistent with use.The measurement across the ledges of the inlay which are the widest portion of the implant and responsible for mating with the inserter were confirmed to be within the specification of 23mm +0/-0.1 at 22.94mm as measured with micrometers om33.The inner edges of the ledges were also confirmed to be within the specification of 21mm +0/-0.1 at 20.93mm as measured with micrometers om33.The slots along the arm component of each inserter were inspected and no damage was observed.The slots properly mated with the returned implant when held in position.However, as the inferior arms of the inserter are designed to rotate and lock into the inferior plate, establishing a fixed distance between the two arms that would allow the polyethylene inlay to slide within the groove, a full functional test could not be performed.Thus, replication of the complaint condition is not applicable as the adjoining implants and instruments were not received.In conclusion, the complaint condition could not be confirmed and no functional or dimensional issues were identified with the returned parts.A review of the current design drawing / manufactured revision for the top level, the inserter arm component with stop, the inserter arm component without stop, the top level and the detailed inlay was performed.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.The returned parts were determined to be suitable for their intended use when employed and maintained as recommended.In conclusion, the complaint condition could not be confirmed and no functional or dimensional issues were identified with the returned parts.Thus, as no issues were identified with the returned devices, further investigation is not warranted.No functional or dimensional issues were identified with the returned parts.Thus, given the unconfirmed condition and the unknown circumstances at the time of the issue a root cause could not be definitively determined.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POLYETHYLENE INLAY W/TANTALUM MARKER/MEDIUM-10MM-STERILE
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
mark vornheder
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5860164
MDR Text Key51861448
Report Number2530088-2016-10215
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2017
Device Catalogue NumberPDL-M-PT10S
Device Lot Number7803186
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/25/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age52 YR
Patient Weight95
-
-