• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS GLIDEPATH LONG-TERM HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER WITH PRELOADED STYLET STANDARD KIT; BLOOD ACCESS DEVICE AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS GLIDEPATH LONG-TERM HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER WITH PRELOADED STYLET STANDARD KIT; BLOOD ACCESS DEVICE AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5393230
Device Problems Bent (1059); Stretched (1601); Unraveled Material (1664)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of complications with the guidewire is confirmed, and the cause is determined to be use-related.The product returned is a broken 0.038¿ guidewire in its hoop with advancing mechanism with a length not exactly determinable due to its condition.In this case, ¿distal¿ refers to nearer the j-tip and ¿proximal¿ means nearer to the straight end.Visual evaluation showed that the guidewire manifested a large amount of residue on its surface, and some residue was found inside the hoop.Examination of the depth markings showed that the wire was evidently approximately 69 cm long.The shorter core wire was broken at the distal end, with a large amount of the coiled wire extending distally, with the region just proximal to the point at which the core wire emerged from the coil wire somewhat stretched.Tactual evaluation showed that the coil wire distal to the broken core wire was much more floppy than the remaining wire.A kink was noted at about 3.4 cm from the j-tip.The coil wire was completely broken at the distal end of the distal 30-cm depth mark.According to preliminary evaluation, this break occurred during decontamination.Microscopic examination showed that both core wires were broken at their respective distal ends.The distal end of the shorter wire retained a ball of metal at the tip, apparently the internal weld tip.The distal end of the longer core wire showed signs of necking both at on the wire and the broken weld tip still attached to the coil wire.The distal end of the coil wire had to be stretched out in order to make this determination.This necking is indicative of a tensile event, consistent with retraction against resistance.Retraction against the needle is a known cause of guidewire breakage, although neither this nor any other needle damage or defects possibly indicative of and/or contributing to this event can be confirmed as no needle was returned.Accumulation of tissue within the needle when retracting a guidewire while in the needle may also result in increased resistance to movement; however, retraction of the guidewire against the needle is contrary to ifu instructions.In any event, it is evident that the guidewire was retracted against resistance, causing it to break.This complaint is therefore confirmed, and the cause is determined to be use-related.The ifu states that if the guidewire must be withdrawn while the needle is inserted, remove both the needle and wire as a unit to prevent the needle from damaging or shearing the guidewire.The guidewire should not be pulled back against the needle.A lot history review (lhr) of rean0787 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
 
Event Description
On 06/27/16 - per sales representative, facility contact reported that when placing a glidepath hemodialysis catheter the needle would go in but would not come out.The health professional opened another catheter to finish the case.On 07/29/2016 - during decontamination on (b)(6) 2016, the wire was found to have blood residue and was bent, unraveled, and stretched with the core wire broken.On 08/11/16 - facility confirmed that the "guidewire would not go in".They originally reported that the needle would not advance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GLIDEPATH LONG-TERM HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER WITH PRELOADED STYLET STANDARD KIT
Type of Device
BLOOD ACCESS DEVICE AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas
MX  
Manufacturer Contact
maren treft
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225964
MDR Report Key5886251
MDR Text Key53391330
Report Number3006260740-2016-00435
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MSD
UDI-Device Identifier0080174102181
UDI-Public(01)0080174102181(17)180128(10)REAN0787
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K051748
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/24/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/18/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/28/2018
Device Catalogue Number5393230
Device Lot NumberREAN0787
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/14/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received07/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-