(b)(4).The device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was confirmed.However, the assignable root cause was not determined.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that before an unspecified surgical procedure the motor device would not work.During service and evaluation, it was observed that the motor device motor and control were defective.It was noted that the device became hot, was loud, the tool did not engage, temperature after twenty seconds and white smoke in the coupling, and vibrations at the housing.It was noted that the device failed pre-repair diagnostic tests for loctite and cable assessments, cutter lock assessment, temperature assessment, noise assessment, and vibration.It was not reported if there was any delay in a planned surgical procedure or if a spare device was available for use.There was no patient involvement reported.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|