According to the implant registration cards (irc) provided on 08/11/2016, the patient had surgery on (b)(6) 2016 and had onxae-23 sn (b)(4) implanted.On (b)(6) 2016, onxae-23 sn (b)(4) was removed and an onxae-21 sn (b)(4) was implanted.Additional information via operative notes were requested and received via fax on 09/26/2016.These operative notes were reviewed by the medical director and the following memo was created: operative notes received indicate the following regarding explant of the initial valve 8 days post-op ((b)(6) 2016) - "the pre-intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram seemed to indicate a fistula between the aorta and the right atrium.This is indeed what we found.Because i had very extensively decalcified the aortic annulus, there was a small area in the ascending aorta, the aortic root that i had oversewn.This area was nice and loose and, as mentioned earlier, i had used a smaller valve to minimize the stress and on 2 subsequent echocardiograms, it actually looked very nice.This area, he had torn the aortic root adjacent to this repair and had torrential flow into his right atrium: and "the valve was, indeed, seated very well with no evidence of dehiscence whatsoever.It was obvious that there was a large defect just under the right coronary ostium draining into the right atrium.The previously placed valve was removed." based on this information, there is no indication that the reported events/explant are related to the on-x valve and no allegation of deficiency is made.Therefore, complaint (b)(4) will be voided.
|