• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ON-X LIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC ON-X AORTIC HEART VALVE AND EXTENDED HOLDER 23MM; MECHANICAL HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ON-X LIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC ON-X AORTIC HEART VALVE AND EXTENDED HOLDER 23MM; MECHANICAL HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number ONXAE-23
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Fistula (1862); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); No Information (3190); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 07/27/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
 
Event Description
According to the implant recovery card, patient implanted with onxae-23 (b)(4) on (b)(6) 2016 and required reoperation/explant on (b)(6) 2016.Replaced with onxae-21.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the implant registration cards (irc) provided on 08/11/2016, the patient had surgery on (b)(6) 2016 and had onxae-23 sn (b)(4) implanted.On (b)(6) 2016, onxae-23 sn (b)(4) was removed and an onxae-21 sn (b)(4) was implanted.Additional information via operative notes were requested and received via fax on 09/26/2016.These operative notes were reviewed by the medical director and the following memo was created: operative notes received indicate the following regarding explant of the initial valve 8 days post-op ((b)(6) 2016) - "the pre-intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram seemed to indicate a fistula between the aorta and the right atrium.This is indeed what we found.Because i had very extensively decalcified the aortic annulus, there was a small area in the ascending aorta, the aortic root that i had oversewn.This area was nice and loose and, as mentioned earlier, i had used a smaller valve to minimize the stress and on 2 subsequent echocardiograms, it actually looked very nice.This area, he had torn the aortic root adjacent to this repair and had torrential flow into his right atrium: and "the valve was, indeed, seated very well with no evidence of dehiscence whatsoever.It was obvious that there was a large defect just under the right coronary ostium draining into the right atrium.The previously placed valve was removed." based on this information, there is no indication that the reported events/explant are related to the on-x valve and no allegation of deficiency is made.Therefore, complaint (b)(4) will be voided.
 
Event Description
According to the implant recovery card, patient implanted with onxae-23 ((b)(4)) on (b)(6) 2016 and required reoperation/explant on (b)(6) 2016.Replaced with onxae-21.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ON-X AORTIC HEART VALVE AND EXTENDED HOLDER 23MM
Type of Device
MECHANICAL HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ON-X LIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC
1300 e. anderson ln.
bldg b
austin TX 78752
Manufacturer (Section G)
CRYOLIFE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer Contact
rochelle maney
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw, GA 30144
7704193355
MDR Report Key5910628
MDR Text Key53378165
Report Number1649833-2016-00041
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P000037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/11/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/29/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date01/29/2022
Device Model NumberONXAE-23
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/15/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age50 YR
-
-