• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN KANGAROO PEDIATRIC FEEDING TUB; ENTERAL FEEDING TUBE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN KANGAROO PEDIATRIC FEEDING TUB; ENTERAL FEEDING TUBE Back to Search Results
Model Number 460711E
Device Problem Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem Internal Organ Perforation (1987)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Submit date: 8/30/2016.An investigation is currently underway.Upon completion, the results will be forwarded.
 
Event Description
It was reported to covidien on 8/22/2016 that an adverse event occurred with enteral feeding tube.The customer reports the rn inserted this feeding tube via l nare on (b)(6) infant.Tube taped at 21 cm per measurement, placement verified by auscultating small amount of air and aspirated small amount of blood.After rn fed infant via ngt, the patient developed increasing respiratory distress.Xray revealed the feeding tube had been passed through the trachea, not the esophagus, and the feeding tube had perforated the left lung of the baby and was behind the stomach.The day of the incident the patient had 2 chest tubes and was placed on a ventilator and transferred to a higher level of care.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Submit date: 09/20/2016.Originally reported: "it was reported to covidien on (b)(6) 2016 that an adverse event occurred with enteral feeding tube.The customer reports the rn inserted this feeding tube via l nare on (b)(6) newborn infant.Tube taped at 21cm per measurement, placement verified by auscultating small amount of air and aspirated small amount of blood.After rn fed infant via ngt, the patient developed increasing respiratory distress.X-ray revealed the feeding tube had been passed through the trachea, not the esophagus, and the feeding tube had perforated the left lung of the baby and was behind the stomach.The day of the incident the patient had 2 chest tubes and was placed on a ventilator and transferred to a higher level of care." it has been updated to: "it was reported to covidien on (b)(6) 2016 that an adverse event occurred with enteral feeding tube.The customer reports an estimated 36-38 weeks gestational age baby boy born via caesarian section due to breech presentation weighing (b)(6) was brought to the nicu post-delivery due to respiratory distress.Rn inserted feeding tube into the left nare, tube taped at 21cm per measurement, placement verified by auscultating small amount of air and aspirated small amount of blood.After rn administered 10 ml of feeds via gravity through the ng (nasogastric) tube the patient developed increasing respiratory distress.Patient was intubated and chest x-ray revealed the feeding tube had been passed through the trachea, not the esophagus, and the feeding tube had perforated the left lung of the baby and was behind the stomach.Chest tube placement x2 and transfer of patient to higher level of care.Approximately, 5-7 days post incident current patient's condition was assessed.Patient had to have new chest tubes place surgically and patient was extubated and placed on hfnc (high flow nasal cannula).Patient has since left the hospital and condition unknown.".
 
Event Description
It was reported to covidien on (b)(6) 2016 that an adverse event occurred with enteral feeding tube.The customer reports an estimated 36-38 weeks gestational age baby boy born via caesarian section due to breech presentation weighing (b)(6) was brought to the nicu post-delivery due to respiratory distress.Rn inserted feeding tube into the left nare, tube taped at 21cm per measurement, placement verified by auscultating small amount of air and aspirated small amount of blood.After rn administered 10 ml of feeds via gravity through the ng (nasogastric) tube the patient developed increasing respiratory distress.Patient was intubated and chest x-ray revealed the feeding tube had been passed through the trachea, not the esophagus, and the feeding tube had perforated the left lung of the baby and was behind the stomach.Chest tube placement x2 and transfer of patient to higher level of care.Approximately, 5-7 days post incident current patient's condition was assessed.Patient had to have new chest tubes place surgically and patient was extubated and placed on hfnc (high flow nasal cannula).Patient has since left the hospital and condition unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Submit date: 12/02/2016.Samples were not received for the investigation.The device history record was reviewed and indicated that the product was released accomplishing all quality standards.Because a sample was not returned, we were unable to perform a follow up investigation to include functional and visual evaluations to confirm the defect and root cause analysis.A corrective action is not applicable at this time.Functional testing and visual inspections are being performed according to our current quality standards and inspection procedures.This complaint will be used for qa tracking and trending purposes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record (dhr) was reviewed indicating that the product was released accomplishing all quality standard requirements.There were no non-conforming issues reported during the production of this product for a similar condition as reported in this complaint.One decontaminated sample was received for evaluation.During the examination of the sample, it was confirmed that the product complied with all quality requirements.The analysis performed by the multi-functional reveals the failure mode could not be confirmed, therefore the root cause was not identified.The personnel involved in the manufacturing process were notified about the reported condition.The manufacturing process is running according to product specifications meeting quality acceptance criteria.We will keep monitoring the process for any adverse trends that require immediate attention.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
KANGAROO PEDIATRIC FEEDING TUB
Type of Device
ENTERAL FEEDING TUBE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
calle 9 sur no. 125 cuidad
industrial
tijuana
MX 
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
calle 9 sur no. 125 cuidad
industrial
tijuana 92173
MX   92173
Manufacturer Contact
edward almeida
15 hampshire st
mansfield, MA 02048
5084524151
MDR Report Key5913933
MDR Text Key53484306
Report Number9612030-2016-00413
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,user facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/22/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/30/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number460711E
Device Catalogue Number460711E
Device Lot Number614519364X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/02/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/02/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-