(b)(4).The dhr for the returned instrument was reviewed and found completely without any irregularities, this instrument was produced at the tecomet, inc.(b)(4) in march of 2016 as part of a 35 pc.Lot.The returned instrument was evaluated and found that it was returned with the jaws off of the instrument and only one jaw was returned for the evaluation along with the instrument.During the evaluation, it was noticed that both pins on the drive rod which activates the jaws are damaged and one leg of the tube assembly is bent signifying that this instrument has been mishandled in some way.Parts were 100% visually inspected and tested at the tecomet (b)(4) facility before instruments were sent to customer.No irregularities were found and or reported at the time of inspection and assembly of the product as this is a standardized process for all instruments manufactured at this facility.At this time, it is undetermined as to how the jaw fell off of this instrument and fell into the patient, but mishandling at the customer facility is suspected.No corrective action required at this time.
|