• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ACTIVATEK, INC. ACTIVAPATCH INTELLIDOSE 2.5; IONTOPHORESIS PATCH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ACTIVATEK, INC. ACTIVAPATCH INTELLIDOSE 2.5; IONTOPHORESIS PATCH Back to Search Results
Model Number 001-40
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn (2696)
Event Date 05/10/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device not returned.
 
Event Description
Patch was removed from pouch; pull tab was removed activating the patch.Patient's skin was inspected and found to be intact.During initial examination of the area, sensation to crude light touch was noted to be intact.Treatment area was wiped clean with the provided alcohol wipe and allowed to thoroughly air dry.Utilizing a marked syringe, 2.0 cc of acetic acid was drawn and then used to hydrate the active ionic solution reservoir.No dry spots on the pad were observed.The liner was peeled from the patch; the patch was placed directly on the treatment area.The remaining release liner over the pull tab was removed.The flash sequence was observed, compared to the flash sequence chart provided and found to be one flash/30 sec, indicating "low skin resistance, treatment started." patient reported some initial stinging and burning sensations and was instructed to remove patch if those feelings persisted.By the time the patient left the clinic, 5 minutes later, she reported that the burning and stinging had decreased; she left with the patch in place; i emphasized again that if any further burning continued, she was to remove the patch immediately and wash the area with warm soapy water.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient phoned the clinic.I spoke to her and she told me that she had gone out to dinner the prior evening after leaving the clinic.She had set an alarm to alert her when the 2.5 hours had passed.When the alarm sounded, she had difficulty removing the patch.The patient reported that she had experienced no discomfort while wearing the patch.The initial burning and stinging had lasted only a short period, then she felt nothing.She said there appeared to be a residual film on her skin and that it had a black and green appearance.I told her i suspected it may be clothing fibers clinging to any residual adhesive and asked her to come in to the clinic so i could see it.When the patient arrived, i observed a 4 cm height, 5 cm width round area of black tissue, which i photographed.I phoned her physician's office and arranged for her to be seen urgently that afternoon.I spoke with her physician after he saw her; he informed me the patient has a 4.5 cm full thickness burn, which will need to be debrided and surgically closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVAPATCH INTELLIDOSE 2.5
Type of Device
IONTOPHORESIS PATCH
Manufacturer (Section D)
ACTIVATEK, INC.
8100 camino arroyo
gilroy CA 95020
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer moffatt
8100 camino arroyo
gilroy, CA 95020
8008219319
MDR Report Key5931376
MDR Text Key54021111
Report Number3005917950-2016-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EGJ
UDI-Device Identifier00859975005219
UDI-Public(01)00859975005219
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K091326
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type user facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/11/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/06/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Physical Therapist
Device Expiration Date05/31/2016
Device Model Number001-40
Device Catalogue NumberNC89188
Device Lot NumberBEW140401
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/11/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-