(b)(4).Neither the device nor films of applicable imaging studies were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.Multiple products were implanted during the procedure.Although it is unknown if any of the devices contributed to the reported event, we are filing this mdr for notification purposes.
|
It was reported that on: (b)(6) 2004, the patient presented with pre-op diagnosis of degenerative disc disease, angular tear l4-5.The patient underwent following procedures: posterior intralaminar partial interfacet fusion with rhbmp-2, allograft , autograft prp matrix at l4-5.M8 pedicle and rod , screw fixation , l4-5.Ssfp monitoring and direct pedicle screw stimulation.Per op-notes, ".Granules and the autograft to allograft was wrapped in the bmp sponge mixed with prp matrix.This was placed in the region expanding the l4-5 lamina interspace and sacral area." on (b)(6) 2005, the patient presented with residual low back discomfort over the instrumentation.Pre-op diagnosis of the patient was retained pedicle screw instrumentation with pseudoarthrosis.The patient underwent following procedures: removal of pedicle screw fixation ,l4-5; exploration of fusion ; scar revision 2 cm ; ssep- somatosensory evoked potential.Per op-notes, ".Locking heads were then removed , and then the rod was securely withdrawn.The screws then had a torque wrench placed and the screws were withdrawn , identified no evidence of any loosening or motion or seromatous fluid.".
|