It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in the lower limb.After placement of the.014" hi-torque pilot guide wire (gw), the 2.0 x 120 mm armada balloon catheter was inserted, but could not be advanced on the gw so it was removed.A 2.0 x 80 mm armada was then attempted to be advanced, but it also could not advance on the gw and was removed.The physician had noted prior to use that the pilot gw felt stiffer than usual.The gw was exchanged for a new.014" hi-torque pilot gw and the 2.0 x 120 mm armada was advanced and used successfully in the procedure.The nurse noted that the 1st gw seemed bigger than the 2nd gw.It was more like a.018" gw and not even like a pilot gw; she thought it seemed like a non-abbott gw.The nurse confirmed that the gw package was sealed until use in the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.Visual, dimensional, and functional inspections were performed on the returned device.The difficult to position with the balloon catheter and mislabeling were not confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties.
|