• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem Aortic Regurgitation (1716)
Event Date 06/06/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: the device was not returned to edwards for evaluation as it remained implanted.The device history record (dhr) was not able to be reviewed as the device information was not provided.Although bioprosthetic valves have been proven to have excellent long term durability, failure does occur in a small number of valves.Replacement of a bioprosthetic valve over time is more likely due to structural valve deterioration (svd) which occurs as a result of stenosis (from calcification or host tissue overgrowth), dehiscence, fibrosis or non-calcific degeneration.As the device was not returned for evaluation, the root cause for the degeneration, regurgitation, and leaflet tears remains indeterminable.However, it is likely that patient related factors and the progression of the underlying valvular disease pathology contributed to the event.No corrective action is applicable to this case; however, edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
 
Event Description
Edwards reviewed the article "combined venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of acute aortic prosthesis dysfunction in a high-risk patient" by amedeo pergolini et al, published in the portuguese journal of cardiology, (b)(6) 2016.Abstract: we describe the case of a patient with acute bioprosthesis dysfunction in cardiogenic shock, in whom hemodynamic support was provided by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and successfully treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Within the context of this article a (b)(6) male with a 23mm bioprosthetic aortic valve implanted in the aortic position, underwent surgery for a valve in valve intervention after an implant duration of approximately 6 (six) years due severe aortic regurgitation secondary to valve degeneration and leaflet tears (ef 20%).A 26 mm transcatheter valve was implanted within the disabled 23mm valve through a transapical approach.The patient was noted as to be discharged two weeks after the procedure.At three-month follow-up, the patient was in stable clinical conditions, in new york heart association class ii, with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (about 40%).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Event date: (b)(6) 2012.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
neil landry
one edwards way
m/s t&d 2
irvine, CA 92614
9492502289
MDR Report Key5938162
MDR Text Key54265153
Report Number2015691-2016-02695
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/16/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/08/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-