• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET SPORTS MEDICINE RATCHET BIPASS SUTURE PASSER; MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR GENERAL USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET SPORTS MEDICINE RATCHET BIPASS SUTURE PASSER; MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR GENERAL USE Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.Review of device history records show the lot released with no recorded anomaly or deviation.There are warnings in the package insert that state that this type of event can occur: under care and handling of instruments, it states, "surgical instruments and instrument cases are susceptible to damage for a variety of reasons including prolonged use, misuse, rough or improper handling." this report is number 1 of 2 mdrs filed for the same event (reference 1825034-2016-03612 / 03613).
 
Event Description
It was noted that during the testing of this product outside of a procedure, the disposable nitinol wire would not pass easily through the suture passer.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.Review of the device history records for pn 902099 ln 106590 identified no deviations or anomalies.Product was visually examined and found to have very little wear externally.The product was then function tested with the bipass disposable nitinol that was returned and there was significant resistance felt when attempting to push the nitinol through the device therefore, confirming the complaint.A new bipass disposable nitinol was requisitioned from the shelf and the device was again function tested.The same resistance was felt with this pusher as with the last one.Therefore, it was determined that the issue was the bipass suture punch and not the nitinol.It cannot be determined why there was significant resistance felt when trying to pass the nitinol through the suture punch.It is possible that repetitive use has worn down the inner barrel of the punch but this cannot be confirmed.A conclusive root cause could not be determined.Further investigation into this issue is ongoing and if additional information is received, a follow-up report will be submitted to the fda.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: date returned to manufacturer was corrected upon receiving the tracking number.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RATCHET BIPASS SUTURE PASSER
Type of Device
MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR GENERAL USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET SPORTS MEDICINE
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
megan haas
56 e. bell drive
warsaw, IN 46582
5743726700
MDR Report Key5949560
MDR Text Key54683342
Report Number0001825034-2016-03612
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
PEXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/14/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number902099
Device Lot Number106590
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/07/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/13/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-