• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER SPINE-US ACCULIF TL 6-9 MM X 11 MM X 34 MM X 0 DEG CAGE; INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER SPINE-US ACCULIF TL 6-9 MM X 11 MM X 34 MM X 0 DEG CAGE; INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 305006
Device Problems Collapse (1099); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Mechanical Problem (1384); Decrease in Pressure (1490)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/17/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that; the surgeon starting turning the t-handle to expand the cage.The cage lifted some, but then the syringe body psi gauge started to release and pressure was lost.We then took off the syringe body and filled with saline again and processed to retry.As he turned the t-handle again, we noticed no water leaking from anywhere on the syringe, inserter or cage.The cage would start to expand and then it was as if intermittently the pressure would hold and then release while the gauge showed just barely in the yellow section.It did not seem as though we hit the 2000 psi required to release the pressure either.This delayed the case by about 5 minutes.We tried one last time to refill the syringe body and expand the cage; it expanded what seems to look like 9mm, the maximum for this cage.However, surgeon kept feeling like pressure would hold one second and then try and release another, so the confidence of the expansion was questioned.There were no adverse effects to the patient and once surgeon reached what seemed to be full expansion, we disconnected the inserter from the cage and continued on with the case.Returning syringe body and tubing only; cage was implanted.Updated: 2 weeks post op the cage collapse.There is no plan for a revision surgery, and no adverse consequences reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Method: device history review, complaint history review, risk assessment; result: manufacturing records were reviewed for the corresponding lot and no relevant issues were identified.Based on the fatigue testing results, the surgeon must consider the levels of implantation, patient weight, patient activity level, other patient conditions, etc.Which may impact the performance of the intervertebral body fusion device.If the patient is involved in an occupation or activity which applies inordinate stress upon the implant (e.G.Substantial walking, running, lifting, or muscle strain) the surgeon must advise the patient that resultant forces can cause failure of the device.Sales rep reported that the surgeon was hesitant to provide information regarding patient's lifestyle, operative notes and clinical history.According to instruction for use patient activity level and life style may be contributing factors of possible device failure.Conclusion: failure of the implant could not be confirmed conclusively therefore a plausible root cause could not be identified.
 
Event Description
It was reported that; the surgeon starting turning the t-handle to expand the cage.The cage lifted some, but then the syringe body psi gauge started to release and pressure was lost.We then took off the syringe body and filled with saline again and processed to retry.As he turned the t-handle again, we noticed no water leaking from anywhere on the syringe, inserter or cage.The cage would start to expand and then it was as if intermittently the pressure would hold and then release while the gauge showed just barely in the yellow section.It did not seem as though we hit the 2000 psi required to release the pressure either.This delayed the case by about 5 minutes.We tried one last time to refill the syringe body and expand the cage; it expanded what seems to look like 9mm, the maximum for this cage.However, surgeon kept feeling like pressure would hold one second and then try and release another, so the confidence of the expansion was questioned.There were no adverse effects to the patient and once surgeon reached what seemed to be full expansion, we disconnected the inserter from the cage and continued on with the case.Returning syringe body and tubing only; cage was implanted.Updated: 2 weeks post op the cage collapse.There is no plan for a revision surgery, and no adverse consequences reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCULIF TL 6-9 MM X 11 MM X 34 MM X 0 DEG CAGE
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER SPINE-US
2 pearl court
allendale NJ 07401
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER SPINE-US
2 pearl court
allendale NJ 07401
Manufacturer Contact
rakshya bista
2 pearl court
allendale, NJ 07401
2017608000
MDR Report Key5951322
MDR Text Key55051900
Report Number3004024955-2016-00081
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K143616
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/17/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/14/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue Number305006
Device Lot Number10201506
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/08/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/17/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-