|
Lot Number NOT PROVIDED |
Device Problems
Human-Device Interface Problem (2949); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 08/08/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product identifiers (serial id and lot number) were not provided.Therefore, an investigation and re-review of manufacturing records could not be conducted.Although the surgeon utilized the tutopatch in a personalized unique method, the use of tutopatch as a covering membrane sutured to the periosteum, is not contraindicated.The surgeon was trying to achieve a watertight closure, which is not possible.As there was no information regarding rupture or resorption of the membrane, it can be assumed that the fluid escaped via the suture points.In cases where a watertight closure is required (i.E.Duraplasty) , water tightness is achieved by utilizing a sealing agent to prevent leakage via the suture points.Not available for evaluation.
|
|
Event Description
|
Rti surgical, inc (rti) and tutogen medical (b)(4) a wholly owned subsidiary of rti, received a complaint on 08/18/2016 reporting that a tutopatch bovine pericardium was utilized as a barrier after removal of a malignant tumor (site unknown) and filling with a synthetic bone void filler (cerament).The surgeon's expectations were not met.Additional information received indicated that the tutopath was used as a periosteum substitute after removal of a tumor.The surgeon applied a personalized multilayer technique using autologous tissue as well as synthetic material, the latter being loaded with antibiotics.In order to avoid flushing of the antibiotics, the surgeon used the tutopatch as a cover of the multilayer filling material, with the expectation that it would be watertight.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|