An event regarding a revision involving a triathlon insert was reported.Upon investigation, used error was confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: damage was observed on the anterior and distal surfaces, consistent with the explantation process.Impression markings were also observed on the distal surface of the insert, consistent with contact against the baseplate.Burnishing, scratches and third-body indentations were observed on the articulating surface of the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacement,).Medical records received and evaluation: revision of triathlon cr tibial bearing 1½-year post arthroplasty as required for removal of a residual piece of plastic drain tube left in the joint after surgery.The cr 9-mm tibial bearing was replaced with an 11-mm cs type while also the patella was resurfaced that had been left unresurfaced initially.The presence of the residual drain piece was confirmed by ct-scan, no other issues were reported during revision.Device history review: indicates devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot referenced.Conclusion: based on the comments from the clinical consultant, revision of triathlon cr tibial bearing 1½-year post arthroplasty as required for removal of a residual piece of plastic drain tube left in the joint after surgery.The cr 9-mm tibial bearing was replaced with an 11-mm cs type while also the patella was resurfaced that had been left unresurfaced initially.The presence of the residual drain piece was confirmed by ct-scan, no other issues were reported during revision other than some scoring of the femoral component by remnants of the drain tube.The bearing ¿did not look too bad¿ but was replaced.The indication for revision was provided not by any malfunction of one of the implanted devices but for removal of residual plastic pieces of drainage tube left in the joint after he surgery of (b)(6) 2015 as confirmed by ct-scan.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available, this investigation will be reopened.
|