Patient who lives in (b)(6) only part of the year ((b)(6) the remainder) began experiencing increases right hip pain.She previously had a hip replacement several years ago.She presented to an outside hospital.Radiographs performed at the outside hospital revealed a fracture of the femoral stem which was not present on previous films.Surgery was planned at the outside hospital; however, given the complexity of the surgery they felt transfer to a larger facility was better.Therefore, the patient was prepped for revision of the femoral stem and possible revision of the acetabular component.Intraoperative fluid was sent for analysis.Results were consistent with absence of infection so mechanical failure of the implant was suspected.In addition, there was significant polyethylene wear.The acetabular component itself was lightly retroverted and stability was not possible.Therefore, a revision of the acetabulum was performed as well.The implant was found to be fractured as anticipated.But with difficulty, the femoral stem was removed requiring an extended trochanteric osteotomy to facilitate removal.Stable reconstruction with a tapered revision stem, as well as revision of the acetabulum allowed excellent stability even prior to closing the osteotomy including flexion 90 degrees, addition 10 degrees, internal rotation of 80 degrees, and no posterior instability.There was no anterior instability with maximal extension and external rotation.What was the original intended procedure? - right total hip arthroplasty (2009 in (b)(6)) - revision, right totally hip arthroplasty, acetabular, and femoral components including extended trochanteric device usage problem: device failed (e.G.Broke, couldn't get it to work or stopped working).
|