• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANATOMAGE ANATOMAGE GUIDE; SURGICAL GUIDE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANATOMAGE ANATOMAGE GUIDE; SURGICAL GUIDE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/23/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device was returned 2 day prior to 30 day mdr time limit, evaluation of the surgical guide is in progress.
 
Event Description
Doctor experienced depth issues with site 14.After using second drill, doctor felt like he was drilling in bone more than he should.He followed the reference chart and used 22mm.After the second drill, he used a probe to check depth.He determined the osteotomy depth was much deeper than it should've been.He said from the crest of the bone to the apex of the osteotomy, the depth was about 15 or 16mm (even though his implant was 10mm length).To resolve the issue, he decreased the length for the last drills (only went 20mm rather than 22mm).Dr said he would've perforated the sinus but the patient had thick lining and determined the depth issue early on.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation did not show any malfunction.Surgery with a properly seated guide and the prescribed drill depths should have resulted in the correct depth.For this particular case, doctor reported that the tissue flap was performed for the implant site #12,13,and 14 whereas the device labeling indicate tissue flap requirement for only site #12 and 13.Without soft tissue support in the posterior implant site region, pressing down on the guide during drilling procedure may cause the guide to slightly bend and drill to go deeper than planned.
 
Event Description
Doctor experienced depth issues with site 14.After using second drill, doctor felt like he was drilling in bone more than he should.He followed the reference chart and used 22mm.After the second drill, he used a probe to check depth.He determined the osteotomy depth was much deeper than it should've been.He said from the crest of the bone to the apex of the osteotomy, the depth was about 15 or 16mm (even though his implant was 10mm length).To resolve the issue, he decreased the length for the last drills (only went 20mm rather than 22mm).Dr said he would've perforated the sinus but the patient had thick lining and determined the depth issue early on.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANATOMAGE GUIDE
Type of Device
SURGICAL GUIDE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANATOMAGE
303 almaden blvd
suite 700
san jose CA 95110
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANATOMAGE
303 almaden blvd
suite 700
san jose CA 95110
Manufacturer Contact
phyo soe
303 almaden blvd
suite 700
san jose, CA 95110
4088851474
MDR Report Key5975130
MDR Text Key55560746
Report Number3008272529-2016-00028
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NDP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/24/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/23/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Dentist
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/21/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/24/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/22/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
-
-