• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ON-X LIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ON-X MITRAL HEART VALVE WITH CONFORM-X SEWING RING -25/33; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ON-X LIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ON-X MITRAL HEART VALVE WITH CONFORM-X SEWING RING -25/33; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number ONXMC-25/33
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Congenital Defect/Deformity (1782); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/31/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
 
Event Description
According to the initial report on 08/31/2016, "surgeon replied to an email i sent him.He said that he had to do a re-op on a patient with a perivalvular leak in the mitral position.Email is below: 'i have reservations about this valve, particularly in the mitral position.We have reoperated on a thrombosed valve recently.In addition, i will reoperate on a patient next week with a severe periprosthetic leak.Both reoperations have (or will) occurred within one year of original implant.In my practice, the implantation of mechanical valves are rare.In so far as possible, i try to avoid them.'" the rep stated that the "thrombosed valve he mentions was reported already" as a separate complaint.The rep also confirmed that the valve in question was an on-x valve. additional information received indicated that the valve was implanted (b)(6) 2015.Dr.Turner did not explant that valve after all.What he found was an asd that he fixed with suture.They came off pump and watched the valve for a bit to make sure that everything was working properly and then they pulled the cannula's and closed him up.Patient did fine and nothing was done to the valve itself.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Brand name and model #/lot # updated to reflect correct product size.The rep forwarded another email from the nurse on 09/19/2016 that stated the surgeon "did not explant that valve after all.What he found was an asd [atrial septal defect] that he fixed with suture.They came off pump and watched the valve for a bit to make sure that everything was working properly and then they pulled the cannula's and closed him up.Patient did fine and nothing was done to the valve itself.¿ the manufacturing records for the onxmc-25/33, sn (b)(4), were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.The onxmc-25/33, sn (b)(4) was implanted (b)(6) 2015 and required reoperation on (b)(6) 2016 for possible pvl.Upon reoperation, the diagnosis of pvl was found to be erroneous; the "leak" was due to an asd.Normally a congenital condition, asd's can persist without detection into adulthood.An asd shunt jet could be very close to where a pvl jet might appear on echo and so defect proximity to the valve plane may have contributed to the misdiagnosis.The valve was left in place, the asd was sutured shut, and the patient exhibited no further complications.This is not a valve-related event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information from the physician stated, ¿i repaired the pvl but did not seel [say] it was an asd.Looked like a plain pvl.¿ the rep clarified, ¿i spoke to the surgeon after this letter was sent out.The information i got originally, was that it was an asd as stated.Today he told me that it was not an asd but in fact a pvl due to surgeon technique.The on-x mv was left in place and he corrected the pvl.¿ the manufacturing records for the onxmc-25/33, sn (b)(4), were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.The onxmc-25/33, sn (b)(4), was implanted on (b)(6) 2015 and reoperation was performed (b)(6) 2016 for possible pvl.Originally attributed to a leaking atrial septal defect, follow-up information from the surgeon states that this was a pvl due to surgical technique which was corrected upon re-operation (1 year 230 days post-implant) and the mitral valve was left in place.Pvl is a recognized potential adverse event of prosthetic valve implantation and is indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).The root cause in this case was explicitly stated to be surgical technique which was corrected with strategic suture placement.This event does not identify additional hazards or modify the probability and severity of existing hazards.
 
Event Description
According to the initial report on 08/31/2016, "surgeon replied to an email i sent him.He said that he had to do a re-op on a patient with a perivalvular leak [pvl] in the mitral position.Email is below: 'i have reservations about this valve, particularly in the mitral position.We have reoperated on a thrombosed valve recently.In addition, i will reoperate on a patient next week with a severe periprosthetic leak.Both reoperations have (or will) occurred within one year of original implant.In my practice, the implantation of mechanical valves are rare.In so far as possible, i try to avoid them.'" the rep stated that the "thrombosed valve he mentions was reported already" as a separate complaint.The rep also confirmed that the valve in question was an on-x valve.Additional information received indicated that the valve was implanted (b)(6) 2015.The rep stated that the surgeon "did not explant that valve after all.What he found was an asd [atrial septal defect] that he fixed with suture.They came off pump and watched the valve for a bit to make sure that everything was working properly and then they pulled the cannula's and closed him up.Patient did fine and nothing was done to the valve itself.¿ additional information received from the surgeon indicated that the original information presented for the case was incorrect.He stated ¿i repaired the pvl but did not seel [say] it was an asd.Looked like a plain pvl.¿ the rep clarified via email on 12/20/2016, ¿i spoke to the surgeon after this letter [email] was sent out.The information i got originally, was that it was an asd as stated.Today he told me that it was not an asd but in fact a pvl due to surgeon technique.The on-x mv was left in place and he corrected the pvl.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ON-X MITRAL HEART VALVE WITH CONFORM-X SEWING RING -25/33
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ON-X LIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
1300 e. anderson ln.
bldg b
austin TX 78752
Manufacturer (Section G)
ON-X LIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
1300 e. anderson ln
bldg b
austin TX 78752
Manufacturer Contact
rochelle maney
1655 roberts blvd nw
kennesaw, GA 30144
MDR Report Key5986428
MDR Text Key55885986
Report Number1649833-2016-00058
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P000037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/09/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/29/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date10/23/2019
Device Model NumberONXMC-25/33
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date08/31/2016
Date Manufacturer Received08/31/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age46 YR
-
-