• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HEARTWARE, INC HEARTWARE® VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM; CIRCULATORY ASSIST SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HEARTWARE, INC HEARTWARE® VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM; CIRCULATORY ASSIST SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1104
Device Problems Break (1069); Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/22/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The hvad is used for treatment not diagnosis.The driveline cable ((b)(4)) was not returned to manufacturer for evaluation.Review of the manufacturing documentation confirmed that the associated device met all requirements for release.Review of controller log files was not possible as log files were not available for analysis.On-site inspection of the driveline cable revealed damage of the driveline cable, and poor connection of wires to a connector block installed as a bridge during a previous splice repair, thus confirming the reported event.Subsequently, another splice repair was performed to repair the wires and the driveline cable.It was further noted that the patient previously had two other slice repairs and was reported to damage the splice repairs performed on site.Information provided by the user facility indicated that this event involved a patient who intentionally damaged his/her own driveline.The root cause for the reported driveline splice damage can be attributed to inadequate splice design specifications that does not account excessive pull force that may be exerted on to the driveline cable, causing the splice pins to recess and interrupt pump operation.The manufacturer has an open internal investigation for damage to the splice kit.The ventricular assist system is indicated for use as a bridge to cardiac transplantation in patients who are at risk of death from refractory end-stage left ventricular heart failure.The system is designed for in-hospital and out-of-hospital settings, including transportation.The instructions for use (ifu) provides driveline care instructions to the clinician for inspecting the driveline for damage to the polyurethane outer tubing (outer sheath).The ifu and patient manual provide general care instructions on cleaning of the driveline, preventing damage to the polyurethane outer tubing (strain relief recessed out of connector).Prevention of damage and inspection of driveline information is also covered during patient and medical personnel training.Heartware is submitting this correction to a previously submitted mdr report as a result of remediation activities related to fda warning letter fla-14-14, dated june 2, 2014, and pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the vad coordinator on tuesday ((b)(6) 2013) was informed about a patient with a driveline damage.It was stated that the patient had already two splice repairs in the past.It was further stated that the vad coordinator highly suspect he is intentionally damaging the driveline.Manufacturer representative perform a "first aid" repair to regain device operation.Patient was then transfer to another hospital.During his stay there the patient reopened five times the plastic tube of the splice repair.On thursday ((b)(6) 2013) manufacturer representative took a look at the situation and made several pictures of the first aid repair and recognized a poor connection of the wires with the white connector block.At the same day we performed a splice repair with surgical backup.The physician was informed about the likely upcoming problems due to the poor connection of the wires (longer pump off time, if single stator operation will fail).The repair procedure started with cutting the wires of the rear motor.As warned the single stator operation failed.Proceeded with the procedure, finished rear wires and tried to restart pump in single stator operation and failed.Finished front wires to restart in dual stator mode.Pump did not restart correctly (over 25w and 400rpm).Rechecked everything, reconnected and restarted the pump and the pump started in dual stator mode.It was stated that the pump off time due to technical issues was 12 minutes.The clinic requested a solution to prevent the reopening of the white plastic tube by the patient.Physician consented to the use of epoxy and a thread locker to prevent reopening.This event involved a patient who intentionally damaged their own driveline.The site has specifically stated that the event is not a complaint and there is no allegation of device deficiency.No additional information available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HEARTWARE® VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM
Type of Device
CIRCULATORY ASSIST SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
HEARTWARE, INC
14400 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL 33014 3105
Manufacturer (Section G)
HEARTWARE, INC
14400 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL 33014 3105
Manufacturer Contact
nathalie nunez
14400 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes, FL 33014-3105
3053641538
MDR Report Key5992708
MDR Text Key56096935
Report Number3007042319-2016-03423
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P100047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/26/2013
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/01/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/31/2012
Device Catalogue Number1104
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/26/2013
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-