• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, LLC SYNCARDIA FREEDOM DRIVER; EXTERNAL PNEUMATIC DRIVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, LLC SYNCARDIA FREEDOM DRIVER; EXTERNAL PNEUMATIC DRIVER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 595000-001
Device Problem Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problems Death (1802); Fall (1848)
Event Date 08/11/2016
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
The freedom driver was returned to syncardia for evaluation.The results of the investigation will be provided in a follow-up mdr.(b)(4) (3 of 3).
 
Event Description
The reported issue involves the following syncardia temporary total artificial heart (tah-t) system components and are reported under three separate medical device reports: freedom driver s/n (b)(4) (mfr report # 3003761017-2016-00321, freedom driver s/n (b)(4) (mfr report # 3003761017-2016-00341) and freedom driver s/n (b)(4) (mfr report # 3003761017-2016-00342).The customer reported that, according to the patient's girlfriend, the patient and his roommate had to change out his freedom driver "multiple times" that morning.The girlfriend did not know what type of alarms nor how many times the freedom driver was exchanged, as she was not there at the time.The customer also reported that when hospital personnel spoke directly with the patient earlier in the day regarding lab results, he did not mention any freedom driver alarms or exchanges.The customer also reported that the patient was supplied with two backup freedom drivers, but was unsure which driver was supporting the patient at the beginning of the day.The customer also reported that, according to the girlfriend, who was not at the home during these events, the patient's (b)(6) year old son, who was not a trained caregiver, heard an alarm, then a crash.The son found his father lying on his stomach, but was unable to turn him over to check anything out.The son did not know what the alarm was and he did not know where the backup driver was located.The son called a neighbor that lived nearby for help, and then called the patient's caregiver who returned home, retrieved the backup driver and switched the patient.The customer also reported that this series of events lasted approximately 45 minutes and the patient was blue in color when the backup driver was connected and the ambulance arrived.The customer also reported that the patient was transported to a non-certified syncardia (b)(6) hospital.A hospital representative reported to (b)(6) that to her knowledge, the patient arrived with a functioning driver but had expired.The hospital called the syncardia hotline because they were unfamiliar with the device and didn't know how to turn it off.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The freedom driver was returned to syncardia for evaluation.Visual inspection of the exterior components of the driver revealed a fractured display cover.Visual inspection of the interior components of the driver revealed abrasions on the primary motor and the main printed circuit board assembly (pcba).The electronic data (eeprom) were reviewed and revealed three separate 2d "secondary motor voltage to high" fault codes.This alarm is associated with the engagement of the secondary motor.The root cause for the alarms recorded in the eeprom is mishandling of the driver, which resulted in movement of the internal mechanics that created an alarm condition.The driver in "as received" condition passed all functional test requirements with no anomalies or alarms.In addition, the driver was tested on the secondary motor.The driver annunciated a fault alarm, which was expected, and the driver passed all pressure test requirements with no anomalies.The customer-reported fault alarm was duplicated as a result of forced operation of the secondary motor.There was no evidence of a device malfunction.Damage observed during visual inspection indicated the driver suffered an impact shock most likely caused by mishandling of the device.Patients and caregivers are instructed in the ifu and during the hands-on training by the hospital to immediately return any equipment that has been dropped.Freedom driver system guidebook for patients and caregivers section 4 warnings - caution failure to adhere to the warnings listed below may cause the freedom driver system to malfunction or not perform the life-sustaining functions as designed.Warning states "if the freedom driver or any of the accessories are dropped, bring them to your hospital for replacement." freedom driver system guidebook for patients and caregivers section 5 precautions and recommendations - caution failure to adhere to the precautions and recommendations listed below may cause the freedom driver system to malfunction or not perform the life-sustaining functions as designed.Recommendation states "it is strongly recommended to have two people exchange the primary freedom driver for the backup freedom driver.The customer reported that the patient was left without his caregiver.This issue will continue to be monitored and trended as part of the customer experience process.Syncardia has completed its evaluation of this complaint and is closing this file.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The reported issue involves the following syncardia temporary total artificial heart (tah-t) system components and are reported under three separate medical device reports: freedom driver s/n (b)(4) (mfr report # 3003761017-2016-00321, freedom driver s/n (b)(4) (mfr report # 3003761017-2016-00341) and freedom driver s/n (b)(4) (mfr report # 3003761017-2016-00342).The customer reported that, according to the patient's girlfriend, the patient and his roommate (unknown if person was a trained caregiver) had to change out his freedom driver "multiple times" that morning.The girlfriend did not know what type of alarms nor how many times the freedom driver was exchanged, as she was not there at the time.The customer also reported that when hospital personnel spoke directly with the patient earlier in the day regarding lab results, he did not mention any freedom driver alarms or exchanges.The customer also reported that the patient was supplied with two backup freedom drivers, but was unsure which driver was supporting the patient at the beginning of the day.The customer also reported that, according to the girlfriend, who was not at the home during these events, the patient's (b)(6) son, who was the only person with the patient and not a trained caregiver, heard an alarm and then a noise and found the patient lying on his stomach.The son did not know what the alarm was and he did not know where the backup driver was located.The son called a neighbor that lived nearby for help, and then called the patient's caregiver who returned home, retrieved the backup driver and switched the patient.The customer also reported that this series of events lasted approximately 45 minutes before the ambulance arrived.The patient was transported to a non-certified syncardia tah-t center hospital.A hospital representative reported to (b)(6) that to her knowledge, the patient arrived with a functioning driver but had expired.The hospital called the syncardia hotline because they were unfamiliar with the device and didn't know how to turn it off.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCARDIA FREEDOM DRIVER
Type of Device
EXTERNAL PNEUMATIC DRIVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, LLC
1992 e. silverlake road
tucson AZ 85713
Manufacturer Contact
carole marcot
1992 e. silverlake road
tucson, AZ 85713
5205451234
MDR Report Key6007459
MDR Text Key56760433
Report Number3003761017-2016-00342
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOZ
UDI-Device Identifier00858000003121
UDI-Public(01)00858000003121
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/26/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/06/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number595000-001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/21/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/23/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-