Device evaluated by manufacturer: x-ray demonstrated heavy calcification on leaflets 1 and 2, minimal calcification on leaflet 3, and wireform intact.Moderate host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 3mm on leaflet 3 at the inflow aspect and 4mm on leaflet 3 at the outflow aspect.Leaflet 1 had a 9mm tear near commissure 1.Leaflet 1 also had a tear at the free margin of 4mm; 3mm tore through the leaflet and 1mm was non-transmural at the inflow aspect.Leaflet 2 had a 10mm tear near commissure 2, of which approximately 5mmx2mm was missing and was not returned.Leaflet 2 also had a 5mm tear near commissure 3; 3mm tore through the leaflet, and 2mm was non-transmural at outflow aspect.Calcification was evident near the tears.Leaflets appeared thickened and swollen.Additional manufacturer narrative: based on the product evaluation findings, the clinical observation was confirmed.Regurgitation was visually confirmed due to leaflet tears.The observation of calcification, thickened tissue and host tissue restricted leaflet mobility which led to stenosis.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Bioprosthetic tissue valves can deteriorate with time and eventually fail contributing to regurgitation and/or stenosis.There can be a number of potential known and unknown patient related contributing factors.Structural valve deterioration (svd), a common reason for bioprosthesis explant or reoperation, encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcific and non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes, occurring singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Central regurgitation can also develop progressively if host fibrotic tissue grows onto the bioprosthetic valve.The growth may interfere with functionality of the device as the leaflet motion may be restricted leading to abnormal coaptation.Calcific degeneration is contributed to many factors which include patient factors (age, disease state, pharmacological intervention, etc.) mechanical stress related to the valve¿s hemodynamics performance, and glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue.Of these, the fixation process is a relatively minor contributor to calcification for edward¿s tissue valves due to anti-calcification treatments during manufacturing.A definitive root cause could not be determined; however, it is likely that patient related factors and the progression of the underlying valvular disease pathology contributed to the event.No further corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events through the use of edwards quality systems.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|