Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information is not available for reporting.The part number of the subject device was unknown until the receipt of the subject device by the manufacturer on sep 23, 2016.Once the part number was identified, a complaint history for the part could be reviewed and the complaint, initially determined to be non-reportable, was determined to be reportable based on a positive complaint history for similar event.Implant and explant: device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device is not expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation.Initial reporting facility phone number is (b)(6).Pma 510(k): device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.Manufacturing location: synthes (b)(4).Product manufacture date: may 21, 2007.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.No manufacturing-related issues were identified.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|