• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORP 2130787 ROCHESTER MEC WIDEBAND M 30BX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORP 2130787 ROCHESTER MEC WIDEBAND M 30BX Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 36302
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Sticking (1597)
Patient Problem Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 09/26/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter was stuck to the skin.It was later reported that the device was in place for 11 hours.After 20 minutes of trying to remove the catheter, upon removal it was noted that a portion of the patients skin was also removed.Warm water and soap was used, and later oil.When the oil was used, the sheath was removed successfully.The adhesive residue was still visible on the penis and was hard to remove.As a result, the replacement catheter also stuck to the patients skin.There was no other reported intervention performed prior to the placement of the external catheter, and the skin was in good condition before use of the catheter.There were no lesions and the hair was shaved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter was stuck to the skin.It was later reported that the device was in place for 11 hours.After 20 minutes of trying to remove the catheter, upon removal it was noted that a portion of the patients skin was also removed.Warm water and soap was used, and later oil.When the oil was used, the sheath was removed successfully.The adhesive residue was still visible on the penis and was hard to remove.As a result, the replacement catheter also stuck to the patients skin.There was no other reported intervention performed prior to the placement of the external catheter, and the skin was in good condition before use of the catheter.There were no lesions and the hair was shaved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter was stuck to the skin.It was later reported that the device was in place for 11 hours.After 20 minutes of trying to remove the catheter, upon removal it was noted that a portion of the patients skin was also removed.Warm water and soap was used, and later oil.When the oil was used, the sheath was removed successfully.The adhesive residue was still visible on the penis and was hard to remove.As a result, the replacement catheter also stuck to the patients skin.There was no other reported intervention performed prior to the placement of the external catheter, and the skin was in good condition before use of the catheter.There were no lesions and the hair was shaved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter was stuck to the skin.It was later reported that the device was in place for 11 hours.After 20 minutes of trying to remove the catheter, upon removal it was noted that a portion of the patients skin was also removed.Warm water and soap was used, and later oil.When the oil was used, the sheath was removed successfully.The adhesive residue was still visible on the penis and was hard to remove.As a result, the replacement catheter also stuck to the patients skin.There was no other reported intervention performed prior to the placement of the external catheter, and the skin was in good condition before use of the catheter.There were no lesions and the hair was shaved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter was stuck to the patient's skin.It was later reported that the device was in place for 11 hours.Allegedly, after 20 minutes of trying to remove the catheter, upon removal it was noted that a portion of the patients skin was also removed.Warm water and soap was used, and later oil.When the oil was used, the sheath was removed successfully.The adhesive residue was still visible on the penis and was hard to remove.As a result, the replacement catheter also stuck to the patients skin.There was no other reported intervention performed prior to the placement of the external catheter, and the skin was in good condition before use of the catheter.There were no lesions and the hair was shaved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter was stuck to the patient's skin.It was later reported that the device was in place for 11 hours.Allegedly, after 20 minutes of trying to remove the catheter, upon removal, it was noted that a portion of the patients skin was also removed.Warm water and soap was used, and later oil.When the oil was used, the sheath was removed successfully.The adhesive residue was still visible on the penis and was hard to remove.As a result, the replacement catheter also stuck to the patients skin.There was no other reported intervention performed prior to the placement of the external catheter, and the skin was in good condition before use of the catheter.There were no lesions and the hair was shaved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter was stuck to the patient's skin.It was later reported that the device was in place for 11 hours.Allegedly, after 20 minutes of trying to remove the catheter, upon removal, it was noted that a portion of the patients skin was also removed.Warm water and soap was used, and later oil.When the oil was used, the sheath was removed successfully.The adhesive residue was still visible on the penis and was hard to remove.As a result, the replacement catheter also stuck to the patients skin.There was no other reported intervention performed prior to the placement of the external catheter, and the skin was in good condition before use of the catheter.There were no lesions and the hair was shaved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Approx 11 unopened samples were received at (b)(4) for evaluation.No defects were found during visual evaluation, the packages were unopened and the printed information was correct.Per the functional evaluation, an adhesive peel strength was performed to prove the functionality of the adhesive.The acceptable peel strength must be in a range from 0.80 to 2.80 lbf for a mec 6030 wb 02 m 29mm.The samples results were within that specification.Therefore, the reported event was unconfirmed as the product met specifications.The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use state the following: "directions: to apply: wash penis with mild soap and warm water.Dry thoroughly; trim pubic hair if necessary; open package at perforation; to remove plastic insert, squeeze catheter at the top of the white cone and pull to release; unroll self-adhering catheter over penis; gently squeeze the catheter to properly seal adhesive to the skin; connect to collection bag.Important: wear time may be significantly reduced if adhesive is not properly sealed to the skin.Directions: to remove gently roll catheter off the penis.Note: if necessary, apply a warm wet compress (such as a wet washcloth) around the catheter to help loosen the adhesive." (b)(4).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter was stuck to the patient's skin.It was later reported that the device was in place for 11 hours.Allegedly, after 20 minutes of trying to remove the catheter, upon removal, it was noted that a portion of the patients skin was also removed.Warm water and soap was used, and later oil.When the oil was used, the sheath was removed successfully.The adhesive residue was still visible on the penis and was hard to remove.As a result, the replacement catheter also stuck to the patients skin.There was no other reported intervention performed prior to the placement of the external catheter, and the skin was in good condition before use of the catheter.There were no lesions and the hair was shaved.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROCHESTER MEC WIDEBAND M 30BX
Type of Device
MEC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORP 2130787
one rochester medical dr.
stewartville MN 55976
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHESTER MEDICAL CORP 2130787
one rochester medical dr.
stewartville MN 55976
Manufacturer Contact
amy gravley
8195 industrial blvd
covington, GA 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key6029753
MDR Text Key57440483
Report Number1018233-2016-01401
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NNX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/13/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/14/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2019
Device Catalogue Number36302
Device Lot Number53427731
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/11/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-