• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310030
Device Problem Defective Component (2292)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/22/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the brake defeat did not function.During use of a 1.50mm rotalink¿ plus, the brake was not holding the rotawire completely in place.The wire was held in place manually to complete the procedure.The patient was not affected.There were no patient complications and the patient is in stable condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: returned product consisted of the rotablator rotalink plus device.The advancer unit and burr units were received attached together in a single unit.The advancer knob was received loosened in a backward position.There was blood on and in the advancer unit.The brake button and advancer were microscopically and visually inspected and no damage or irregularities were identified.The brake button was received in the as-manufactured position.The brake button was tested and it was able to be pressed and released with no issues.The guidewire used in the procedure was not returned for product analysis, so functional testing was completed with.009¿ rotawire.The rotawire was able to be inserted in the rotablator plus device and the brake worked properly with no issues.The advancer was opened and the brake was examined.There was no damage or irregularities to the brake or the inside the advancer at the brake location.Inspection of the device presented no damage or irregularities.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The root cause is not confirmed as there was no evidence of the alleged issue or any anomalies which could have contributed to the reported difficulty.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the brake defeat did not function.During use of a 1.50mm rotalink¿ plus, the brake was not holding the rotawire completely in place.The wire was held in place manually to complete the procedure.The patient was not affected.There were no patient complications and the patient is in stable condition.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6043542
MDR Text Key57990300
Report Number2134265-2016-09419
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/22/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/20/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2017
Device Model NumberH749236310030
Device Catalogue Number23631-003
Device Lot Number18201699
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/06/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/27/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-