• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS PMTA ACCU2I STANDARD APPLICATOR; MICROWAVE APPLICATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS PMTA ACCU2I STANDARD APPLICATOR; MICROWAVE APPLICATOR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 900-600
Device Problem Bent (1059)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 10/18/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported defective device has yet to be returned to the manufacturer for a device evaluation.The firm is attempting to obtain the device.An investigation into the root cause for product problem is currently in progress.The results of the device evaluation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.Complaint # (b)(4).Device not returned to date.
 
Event Description
As reported (b)(6) 2016, a patient of unknown age and gender presented for amicrowave procedure of the liver.During the procedure it was noted the needle bent at the tip.It did not detach and remained attached to the probe shaft via the internal wiring.The device was set aside and a new of the same was used to successfully complete the procedure.It was reported the patient suffered no harm or injury due to the event.It was reported disposable device is available for return to the manufacturer for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Returned for evaluation was one pmta accu2i standard applicator.A visual examination of the device noted that the tip of the applicator was broken.Functional testing could not be performed due to the condition of the returned device.The customer's reported complaint description of the tip fracture is confirmed.A review of the device history records was performed for the reported packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.Based on the device history review this event does not appear to be due to a manufacturing defect.A possible contributing factor could have been operational context; i.E.Probe placement into hard tissue or lateral forces on the applicator tip during placement or removal.The ifu states; "avoid placing lateral forces on the applicator tip during placement or removal and lateral forces on the applicator tip should be avoided both during insertion and removal.Failure to do so could result in damage to the microwave array, failure of the applicator and injury to the patient." a review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PMTA ACCU2I STANDARD APPLICATOR
Type of Device
MICROWAVE APPLICATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS
603 queensbury avenue
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC.
603 queensbury avenue
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
law ryan
603 queensbury avenue
queensbury, NY 12804
5187424488
MDR Report Key6046928
MDR Text Key58065779
Report Number1319211-2016-00148
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NEY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEZ
PMA/PMN Number
K122762
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/21/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number900-600
Device Lot Number16120512
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/31/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/19/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/05/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-