• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR 8; DXE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR 8; DXE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SEP8
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Physical Resistance (2578); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/25/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure to treat a pulmonary embolism (pe) using an indigo system separator 8 (sep8).During the procedure, the physician placed a non-penumbra sheath in the left coronary artery and then used an indigo system aspiration catheter 8 (cat8) with the sep8 to remove thrombus.After using the sep8 with the cat8 for several passes, the physician experienced resistance and subsequently, the sep8 became stuck in the cat8 and would not move forward or backward.Therefore, the cat8 with the sep8 still inside of it was removed from the patient's body.While the devices were on the back table, the physician removed the sep8 from the cat8 and noticed that the wire in front of the sep8 bulb appeared to be fractured and unwinding.The procedure was then completed using a new sep8 and the same cat8.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k)# has been updated to reflect the most current 510(k) # for the device at the time of the reported complaint.Results: the indigo system separator 8 (sep8) core wire was fractured approximately 148.5 cm from the proximal end.The sep8 bulb was still intact with the coil windings of the sep8.The sep8 coil windings were separated by the investigator for further evaluation.The distal segment of the fractured core wire was intact with the distal tip of the bulb to the distal solder joint.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the core wire to the sep8 was fractured proximal to the bulb.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the sep8 is withdrawn forcefully against resistance, damage such as this may occur.Sep8 devices are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR 8
Type of Device
DXE
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key6056162
MDR Text Key58357041
Report Number3005168196-2016-01513
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00814548016153
UDI-Public00814548016153
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K161523
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/26/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/25/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date12/14/2018
Device Catalogue NumberSEP8
Device Lot NumberF66926
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/23/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/21/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/15/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age45 YR
-
-