• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTXSFT2H04
Device Problems Structural Problem (2506); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/29/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the anterior communicating artery (acom) using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, a smart coil did not take its intended shape as it exited the non-penumbra microcatheter; therefore it was removed.The procedure was completed using a new smart coil and the same non-penumbra microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the penumbra smart coil (smart coil) pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was bent approximately 25.0 and 55.0 cm from the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil had several offset coil windings and did not form its intended shape.Conclusions: evaluation of the smart coil revealed offset coil windings along the length of the embolization coil.This damage was likely the result of repeated cycling of the embolization coil out of and into the distal tip of the non-penumbra microcatheter.Further evaluation revealed that the embolization coil was unable to take its intended shape.It is possible the embolization coil did not take shape due to its pe fibers being too tight.Overtightened pe fibers are known as a source of the inability of the coil to take shape.Further evaluation revealed bends in the pusher assembly.This damage was likely incidental and likely occurred during packaging for return to penumbra facilities.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key6064891
MDR Text Key58717805
Report Number3005168196-2016-01533
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548015323
UDI-Public00814548015323
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/30/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/28/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/06/2021
Device Catalogue Number400SMTXSFT2H04
Device Lot NumberF68279
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/11/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/04/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/07/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
-
-