• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE APEX¿; CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, PERCUTANEOUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE APEX¿; CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, PERCUTANEOUS Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493895912270
Device Problem Hole In Material (1293)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that shaft perforation occurred.A 2.75mmx12mm apex¿ balloon catheter was advanced for dilatation.However, a difficulty in loading the balloon catheter over the wire was encountered.A stylet was then able to load onto the wire and the device was then finally loaded over the wire.After the device was advanced and was attempted to be inflated however, the balloon failed to inflate.When the balloon was taken out from the patient, it was noticed that there was a hole in the shaft where pressure was coming out.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was okay.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of an apex mr balloon catheter.The balloon was loosely folded, and there was blood in the wire lumen.The tip, balloon, inner shaft, outer shaft, port/exit notch, and hypotube were microscopically and tactile inspected.Inspection revealed damage (perforation) to the underside of the port/exit notch (23.5cm from tip) and a kink in the hypotube 16 cm from the strain relief.Functional testing was done with a lab supplied.014¿ guide wire.The wire loaded fine, but became caught at the area of the port/exit notch damage.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that shaft perforation occurred.A 2.75mmx12mm apex¿ balloon catheter was advanced for dilatation.However, a difficulty in loading the balloon catheter over the wire was encountered.A stylet was then able to load onto the wire and the device was then finally loaded over the wire.After the device was advanced and was attempted to be inflated however, the balloon failed to inflate.When the balloon was taken out from the patient, it was noticed that there was a hole in the shaft where pressure was coming out.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was okay.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APEX¿
Type of Device
CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, PERCUTANEOUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6066018
MDR Text Key58720960
Report Number2134265-2016-09658
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/31/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Model NumberH7493895912270
Device Catalogue Number38959-1227
Device Lot Number18897319
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/19/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/09/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-