It was reported that stent foreshortening occurred.The target lesion was located in the carotid artery.A 8.0-36 carotid wallstent(tm) was advanced to treat the lesion.However, during deployment, the length of the stent was found to be shorter than the lesion due to foreshortening.The stent was removed from the patient.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was good.
|
Device avail.For eval, returned to mfr.On, device returned to mfr., device evaluated by mfr., eval summary attached, method codes, result codes, conclusion codes updated.Device evaluated by mfr: the complaint device was returned for analysis.The constrained stent length meets the requirements of the product specification.A visual and tactile examination found no kinks or other damage along the length of the catheter.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The root cause is user preference issue as the product met specification but the user was reportedly dissatisfied with the function, performance or appearance of the product.(b)(4).
|
It was reported that stent foreshortening occurred.The target lesion was located in the carotid artery.A 8.0-36 carotid wallstent was advanced to treat the lesion.However, during deployment, the length of the stent was found to be shorter than the lesion due to foreshortening.The stent was removed from the patient.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was good.
|